The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increase in Bone Mass after Treatment of Hyperprolactinemic Amenorrhea
Abstract
Hyperprolactinemia occurs in 25 to 30 percent of young women with amenorrhea, and this condition is known to be associated with osteopenia. To determine whether the osteopenia is affected by treatment of hyperprolactinemia, we studied 32 women with hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea prospectively for 12 to 72 months to investigate the effects of sustained hyperprolactinemia or return of gonadal function on bone mass. We studied 18 patients using direct photon absorptiometry before and after normalization of serum prolactin levels. Initial bone densities ranged from 0.55 to 0.77 g per square centimeter (mean +/- 1 SD, 0.64 +/- 0.05)--densities significantly lower (P less than 0.001) than those of controls (0.71 +/- 0.04 g per square centimeter). After therapy, bone density increased significantly (P less than 0.001), to 0.67 +/- 0.05 g per square centimeter, but remained lower (P less than 0.05) than normal. Fourteen patients were followed without therapy. Their initial bone densities ranged from 0.62 to 0.75 g per square centimeter (mean, 0.67 +/- 0.04)--values significantly lower (P less than 0.02) than those in controls. There was a significant decrease (P less than 0.002) in bone density over time in this group. We conclude that (1) treatment of hyperprolactinemia increases bone mass in most amenorrheic women with osteopenia, (2) normalization of serum prolactin levels in such women is associated with prevention of bone loss, and (3) a subset of untreated women with hyperprolactinemia have progressive osteopenia, which could have adverse long-term health consequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Decreased spinal mineral content in amenorrheic women
Cann, C. E. (1984) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03340290040017 · Cited by 409
Cited by
Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Melmed, S., Casanueva, F. F., Hoffman, A. R., Kleinberg, D. L., Montori, V. M., Schlechte, J. A., & Wass, J. A. H. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-1692 · Cited by 1,844
Francis, G. L., Waguespack, S. G., Bauer, A. J., Angelos, P., Benvenga, S., Cerutti, J. M., Dinauer, C. A., Hamilton, J., Hay, I. D., Luster, M., et al. (2015) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0460 · Cited by 1,238
Antipsychotic-Induced Hyperprolactinaemia: Mechanisms, Clinical Features and Management
Haddad, P. M., & Wieck, A. (2004) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-200464200-00003 · Cited by 634
Local and Systemic Factors in the Pathogenesis of Osteoporosis
Epstein, F. H., & Raisz, L. G. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198803313181305 · Cited by 493
Mechanisms of Osteoporosis in Adult and Adolescent Women with Anorexia Nervosa*
BILLER, B. M. K., SAXE, V., HERZOG, D. B., ROSENTHAL, D. I., HOLZMAN, S., & KLIBANSKI, A. (1989) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-68-3-548 · Cited by 419
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Klibanski, A., & Greenspan, S. L.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1986-08-28
- Volume
- 315
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 542-546
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2323266720
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increase in Bone Mass after Treatment of Hyperprolactinemic Amenorrhea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198608283150903
- The paper
- Klibanski, A., & Greenspan, S. L. (1986). Increase in Bone Mass after Treatment of Hyperprolactinemic Amenorrhea. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198608283150903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.