The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Population-Based Study of Multiple Sclerosis in Twins
Abstract
Results from studies of twin concordance in multiple sclerosis have not conclusively differentiated between environmental and genetic factors that determine susceptibility to the disease. Published studies that have been based on case finding by public appeal have been characterized by difficulties in ascertainment. The data reported here are from a large population-based study of multiple sclerosis in twins, in which ascertainment has been relatively unbiased and the cooperation of patients nearly complete. A total of 5463 patients attending 10 multiple sclerosis clinics across Canada were surveyed. Twenty-seven monozygotic and 43 dizygotic twin pairs were identified, and the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis was verified by examination and laboratory investigation. Seven of 27 monozygotic pairs (25.9 percent) and 1 of 43 dizygotic pairs (2.3 percent) were concordant for multiple sclerosis. The concordance rate for 4582 nontwin siblings of patients at two multiple sclerosis clinics was 1.9 percent, closely paralleling the concordance rate in dizygotic twins. To the extent that the difference in concordance rates between monozygotic and dizygotic twins indicates genetic susceptibility, the results of this study show a major genetic component in susceptibility to multiple sclerosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The changing demographic pattern of multiple sclerosis epidemiology
Koch-Henriksen, N., & Sørensen, P. S. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70064-8 · Cited by 1,191
Genetics of multiple sclerosis
Dyment, D. A., Ebers, G. C., & Dessa Sadovnick, A. (2004) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00663-x · Cited by 563
Self-citationHLA class II‐associated genetic susceptibility in multiple sclerosis: A critical evaluation
Olerup, O., & Hillert, J. (1991) · Tissue Antigens · doi:10.1111/j.1399-0039.1991.tb02029.x · Cited by 490
Primary biliary cirrhosis in monozygotic and dizygotic twins: Genetics, epigenetics, and environment
Selmi, C., Mayo, M. J., Bach, N., Ishibashi, H., Invernizzi, P., Gish, R. G., Gordon, S. C., Wright, H. I., Zweiban, B., Podda, M., et al. (2004) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.05.005 · Cited by 480
Epidemiologic evidence for multiple sclerosis as an infection
Kurtzke, J. F. (1993) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.6.4.382 · Cited by 472
Metadata
- Authors
- Ebers, G. C., Bulman, D. E., Sadovnick, A. D., Paty, D. W., Warren, S., Hader, W., Murray, T. J., Seland, T. P., Duquette, P., Grey, T., Nelson, R., Nicolle, M., & Brunet, D.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1986-12-25
- Volume
- 315
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 1638-1642
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W1998436005
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Population-Based Study of Multiple Sclerosis in Twins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198612253152603
- The paper
- Ebers, G. C., Bulman, D. E., Sadovnick, A. D., Paty, D. W., Warren, S., Hader, W., Murray, T. J., Seland, T. P., Duquette, P., Grey, T., Nelson, R., Nicolle, M., & Brunet, D. (1986). A Population-Based Study of Multiple Sclerosis in Twins. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198612253152603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.