The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Skull X-Ray Examinations after Head Trauma
Abstract
The value of skull radiography in identifying intracranial injury has not yet been satisfactorily defined. A multidisciplinary panel of medical experts was assembled to review the issue of skull radiography for head trauma. The panel identified two main groups of patients--those at high risk of intracranial injury and those at low risk of such injury--and developed a management strategy for imaging in the two groups. The high-risk group consists primarily of patients with severe open or closed-head injuries who have a constellation of findings that are usually clinically obvious. These patients are candidates for emergency CT scanning, neurosurgical consultation, or both. The low-risk group includes patients who are asymptomatic or who have one or more of the following: headache, dizziness, scalp hematoma, laceration, contusion, or abrasion. Radiographic imaging is not recommended for the low-risk group and should be omitted. An intermediate moderate-risk group is less well defined, and skull radiography in this group may sometimes be appropriate. A prospective study of 7035 patients with head trauma at 31 hospital emergency rooms was conducted to validate the management strategy. No intracranial injuries were discovered in any of the low-risk patients. Therefore, no intracranial injury would have been missed by excluding skull radiography for low-risk patients, according to the protocol. We conclude that use of the management strategy is safe and that it would result in a large decrease in the use of skull radiography, with concomitant reductions in unnecessary exposure to radiation and savings of millions of dollars annually.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASPECTS OF BRAIN INJURY
Kraus, J. F., & McArthur, D. L. (1996) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/s0733-8619(05)70266-8 · Cited by 304
ACR Appropriateness Criteria Head Trauma
Shetty, V. S., Reis, M. N., Aulino, J. M., Berger, K. L., Broder, J., Choudhri, A. F., Kendi, A. T., Kessler, M. M., Kirsch, C. F., Luttrull, M. D., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.023 · Cited by 127
Alcohol-related seizures, part I: Pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and evaluation
Freedland, E. S., & McMicken, D. B. (1993) · The Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/0736-4679(93)90251-2 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Masters, S. J., McClean, P. M., Arcarese, J. S., Brown, R. F., Campbell, J. A., Freed, H. A., Hess, G. H., Hoff, J. T., Kobrine, A., Koziol, D. F., Marasco, J. A., Merten, D. F., Metcalf, H., Morrison, J. L., Rachlin, J. A., Shaver, J. W., & Thornbury, J. R.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1987-01-08
- Volume
- 316
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 84-91
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2033042809
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.