The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk Factors and Response to Antibiotic Therapy in Adults with Bacteremic Pneumonia Caused by Penicillin-Resistant Pneumococci
Abstract
We retrospectively studied 24 adults with bacteremic pneumonia (25 episodes) due to penicillin-resistant pneumococci, for which the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of penicillin G were 0.12 to 8.0 micrograms per milliliter; 79 percent of the strains showed multiple antibiotic resistance. As compared with 48 control patients with bacteremic pneumonia caused by penicillin-sensitive pneumococci, the 24 patients with penicillin-resistant pneumococci had a significantly higher incidence of use of beta-lactam antibiotics during the previous three months (65 vs. 17 percent, P = 0.0008), hospitalization during the previous three months (58 vs. 21 percent, P = 0.0038), nosocomial pneumonia (37 vs. 6 percent, P = 0.0032), episodes of pneumonia during the previous year (29 vs. 4 percent, P = 0.010), and factors on initial presentation that were associated with a poor prognosis (an initially critical condition) (67 vs. 27 percent, P = 0.0030). Their overall mortality rate was significantly higher (54 vs. 25 percent, P = 0.0298). Eleven of 19 episodes of pneumonia due to organisms for which MICs were 0.12 to 2.0 micrograms per milliliter, which were treated with penicillin G (10 episodes) or another beta-lactam agent (9 episodes), resulted in recovery (2 of 10 patients in an initially critical condition recovered, as compared with all of 9 not initially in a critical condition, P = 0.0012). Two patients who had penicillin-resistant pneumococci for which MICs were 4.0 and 8.0 micrograms per milliliter did not respond to ampicillin and ticarcillin therapy, respectively. Our study suggests that pneumonia due to penicillin-resistant pneumococci may occur more often in a population with some identifiable risk factors, and may respond to intravenous high-dose penicillin therapy if MICs are less than or equal to 2 micrograms per milliliter. Cases involving higher resistance may require an alternative antibiotic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pallares, R., Liñares, J., Vadillo, M., Cabellos, C., Manresa, F., Viladrich, P. F., Martin, R., & Gudiol, F. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199508243330802 · Cited by 773
Self-citationTrends in Antimicrobial Prescribing Rates for Children and Adolescents
McCaig, L. F. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.23.3096 · Cited by 517
Doern, G. V., Brueggemann, A., Holley, H. P., & Rauch, A. M. (1996) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.40.5.1208 · Cited by 482
Jorgensen, J. H., Ferraro, M. J., McElmeel, M. L., Spargo, J., Swenson, J. M., & Tenover, F. C. (1994) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.32.1.159-163.1994 · Cited by 138
Lefort, A., Mainardi, J.-L., Selton-Suty, C., Casassus, P., Guillevin, L., & Lortholary, O. (2000) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/00005792-200009000-00006 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Pallares, R., Gudiol, F., Liñares, J., Ariza, J., Rufi, G., Murgui, L., Dorca, J., & Viladrich, P. F.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1987-07-02
- Volume
- 317
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-22
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2337756850
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Factors and Response to Antibiotic Therapy in Adults with Bacteremic Pneumonia Caused by Penicillin-Resistant Pneumococci. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198707023170104
- The paper
- Pallares, R., Gudiol, F., Liñares, J., Ariza, J., Rufi, G., Murgui, L., Dorca, J., & Viladrich, P. F. (1987). Risk Factors and Response to Antibiotic Therapy in Adults with Bacteremic Pneumonia Caused by Penicillin-Resistant Pneumococci. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198707023170104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.