The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from outpatients in the United States during the winter months of 1994 to 1995: results of a 30-center national surveillance study
Open accessAbstract
A total of 1,527 clinically significant outpatient isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were prospectively collected in 30 different U.S. medical centers between November 1994 and April 1995. Overall, 23.6% of strains were not susceptible to penicillin, with 14.1% intermediate and 9.5% high-level resistant. The frequencies of recovery of intermediate and high-level resistant strains varied considerably between different medical centers and in different geographic areas. In general, intermediate and high-level penicillin resistance was most common with isolates of S. pneumoniae recovered from pediatric patients. The in vitro activities of 22 other antimicrobial agents were assessed against this collection of isolates. Ampicillin was consistently 1 twofold dilution less active than penicillin. Amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate were essentially equivalent to penicillin in activity. The rank order of activity for cephalosporins was cefotaxime = ceftriaxone > or = cefpodoxime > or = cefuroxime > cefprozil > or = cefixime > cefaclor = loracarbef > cefadroxil = cephalexin. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards [Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Sixth Information Supplement (M100-S6), 1995] has established MIC breakpoints for resistance (i.e., > or = 2 micrograms/ml) with three cephalosporins versus S. pneumoniae, namely, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and cefuroxime. The overall percentages of strains resistant to these three antimicrobial agents were 3, 5, and 12, respectively. The overall frequency of resistance was 10% with all three macrolides examined in this study, clarithromycin, erythromycin, and azithromycin. The overall percentages of chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance were 4.3, 7.5, and 18, respectively. The resistance percentages among the cephalosporins, macrolides, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were consistently higher among penicillin-intermediate strains than among susceptible isolates and even higher still among organisms expressing high-level penicillin resistance. Multiply resistant strains represented 9.1% of the organisms examined in this study. Finally, rifampin resistance was uncommon (i.e., 0.5%), and vancomycin resistance was not detected. The quinopristin-dalfopristin combination was consistently active at concentrations of 0.25 to 4 micrograms/ml, but rates of resistance could not be determined in the absence of established interpretive criteria for MIC results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
Bruck, E. (1980) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.65.1.187 · Cited by 14,751
Pneumococcal resistance to antibiotics
Klugman, K. P. (1990) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.3.2.171 · Cited by 799
Emergence of Multiply Resistant Pneumococci
Jacobs, M. R., Koornhof, H. J., Robins-Browne, R. M., Stevenson, C. M., Vermaak, Z. A., Freiman, I., Miller, G. B., Witcomb, M. A., Isaäcson, M., Ward, J. I., et al. (1978) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197810052991402 · Cited by 630
Pallares, R., Gudiol, F., Liñares, J., Ariza, J., Rufi, G., Murgui, L., Dorca, J., & Viladrich, P. F. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198707023170104 · Cited by 373
Jorgensen, J. H., Doern, G. V., Maher, L. A., Howell, A. W., & Redding, J. S. (1990) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.34.11.2075 · Cited by 310
Self-citationAntimicrobial Resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States, 1979-1987
Spika, J. S., Facklam, R. R., Plikaytis, B. D., Oxtoby, M. J., & Pneumococcal Surveillance Working Group (1991) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/163.6.1273 · Cited by 261
Sloas, M. M., Ff, B., Chesney, P. J., Bk, E., Bc, H., Tenover, F. C., & Rj, L. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 258
Bradley, J. S., & Connor, J. D. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 217
Nava, J. M., Bella, F., Garau, J., Lite, J., Morera, M.-A., Marti, C., Fontanals, D., Font, B., Pineda, V., Uriz, S., et al. (1994) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/19.5.884 · Cited by 215
Muñoz, R., Dowson, C. G., Daniels, M., Coffey, T. J., Martin, C., Hakenbeck, R., & Spratt, B. G. (1992) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01422.x · Cited by 193
Cited by
Doern, G. V., Heilmann, K. P., Huynh, H. K., Rhomberg, P. R., Coffman, S. L., & Brueggemann, A. B. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.6.1721-1729.2001 · Cited by 538
Self-citationA 20‐Year Epidemiological Study of Pneumococcal Meningitis
Stanek, R. J., & Mufson, M. A. (1999) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/514777 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Doern, G. V., Brueggemann, A., Holley, H. P., & Rauch, A. M.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1208-1213
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2145564885
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 80.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from outpatients in the United States during the winter months of 1994 to 1995: results of a 30-center national surveillance study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.40.5.1208
- The paper
- Doern, G. V., Brueggemann, A., Holley, H. P., & Rauch, A. M. (1996). Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from outpatients in the United States during the winter months of 1994 to 1995: results of a 30-center national surveillance study. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.40.5.1208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.