Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Racial Differences in Low Birth Weight

Kleinman, Joel C., Kessel, Samuel S.·1987·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

To identify the risk factors responsible for differences in birth weight between blacks and whites, we investigated the effects of four maternal characteristics (age, parity, marital status, and education) on rates of very low birth weight (less than 1500 g) and moderately low birth weight (between 1500 and 2500 g). Using 1983 national data, we found that the black:white rate ratio was 3.0 for very low birth weight and 2.3 for moderately low birth weight. The four maternal factors had directionally similar but quantitatively different effects on very low and moderately low birth weight among blacks and whites. Furthermore, the racial differences in infants' birth weights were greater among low-risk than among high-risk mothers, especially for very low birth weight (black:white ratios of 3.4 and 1.7, respectively). We also examined secular trends in the rates of low birth weight among blacks and whites. Between 1973 and 1983, births of infants with moderately low birth weights decreased more among whites than among blacks, whereas births of infants with very low birth weights increased among blacks and decreased among whites. Fifteen percent of the decline in the rate of moderately low birth weight among whites could be attributed to favorable changes in maternal characteristics (primarily an increase in educational level). Among blacks, adverse changes in maternal characteristics (primarily an increase in births to unmarried women) accounted for 35 percent of the increase in the rate of very low birth weight. The adverse effects of childbearing by teenagers on the outcome of pregnancy among blacks appear to have been overemphasized. The persistence of large racial differences in birth weight, even among mothers at low risk, emphasizes the need for specific targeted interventions to achieve further improvements in infant health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198709173171207

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Kleinman, J. C., & Kessel, S. S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1987-09-17
Volume
317
Issue
12
Pages
749-753
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2341022089
Cited by
373
References
6
FWCI
46.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Racial Differences in Low Birth Weight. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198709173171207
The paper
Kleinman, J. C., & Kessel, S. S. (1987). Racial Differences in Low Birth Weight. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198709173171207

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.