Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Initiating and Withdrawing Life Support

Ruark, John Edward, Raffin, Thomas Alfred, The Stanford University Medical Center Committee on Ethics*·1988·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

DURING the past century, dramatic changes have occurred in physicians' ability to prolong life. A hundred years ago, little more than rudimentary supportive care could be offered to most critically ill patients. Doctors now choose from a vast array of interventions that, when combined with effective therapies for underlying conditions, often greatly prolong survival. Unfortunately, the quality of the additional life so skillfully sought can range from marginally tolerable to positively miserable.These considerations underscore the importance of a clear ethical framework for making decisions about the initiation and withdrawal of all medical treatments. This paper considers basic and advanced . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198801073180106

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Ruark, J. E., Raffin, T. A., & The Stanford University Medical Center Committee on Ethics*
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1988-01-07
Volume
318
Issue
1
Pages
25-30
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1985890725
Cited by
280
References
0
FWCI
49.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Initiating and Withdrawing Life Support. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198801073180106
The paper
Ruark, J. E., Raffin, T. A., & The Stanford University Medical Center Committee on Ethics*. (1988). Initiating and Withdrawing Life Support. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198801073180106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.