The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Review: The Effect on Surrogates of Making Treatment Decisions for Others
Abstract
Background Clinical practice relies on surrogates to make or help to make treatment decisions for incapacitated adults; however, the effect of this practice on surrogates has not been evaluated. Purpose To assess the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for adults who cannot make their own decisions. Data sources Empirical studies published in English and listed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, BIOETHICSLINE, PsycINFO, or Scopus before 1 July 2010. Study selection Eligible studies provided quantitative or qualitative empirical data, by evaluating surrogates, regarding the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for an incapacitated adult. Data extraction Information on study location, number and type of surrogates, timing of data collection, type of decisions, patient setting, methods, main findings, and limitations. Data synthesis 40 studies, 29 using qualitative and 11 using quantitative methods, provided data on 2854 surrogates, more than one half of whom were family members of the patient. Most surrogates were surveyed several months to years after making treatment decisions, the majority of which were end-of-life decisions. The quantitative studies found that at least one third of surrogates experienced a negative emotional burden as the result of making treatment decisions. The qualitative studies reported that many or most surrogates experienced negative emotional burden. The negative effects on surrogates were often substantial and typically lasted…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“a phenomenon echoed in the global caregiving literature.”
Citations
Cites
Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research
Mays, N. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50 · Cited by 3,742
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 70
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17224-3 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMsa0907901 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM199002013220506 · DOI
- 10.1164/ajrccm.158.4.9801108 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1478951505050212 · DOI
- 10.1177/1074840706287686 · DOI
- 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819d6495 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02465.x · DOI
- 10.1097/00003246-200110000-00007 · DOI
- Mead GE, 1995, J R Coll Physicians Lond, 29, 295
- 10.1001/archinte.158.8.879 · DOI
- Terry PB, 1999, J Clin Ethics, 10, 286, 10.1086/JCE199910403 · DOI
- 10.1177/135581960501000110 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.b4254 · DOI
- 10.1177/104973239800800305 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archinte.1995.00430060097012 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1041610296002906 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0147-9563(96)80051-3 · DOI
- Jacobson JA, 1997, J Clin Ethics, 8, 359, 10.1086/JCE199708407 · DOI
- 10.4037/ajcc1998.7.1.30 · DOI
- Jeffers BR, 1998, Medsurg Nurs, 7, 357
- 10.1177/019394599802000604 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.52.8.1602 · DOI
- 10.1177/107484079900500405 · DOI
- 10.1177/104973299129121875 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2000.00251.x · DOI
- Robinson EM, 2000, J Nurs Law, 7, 21
- 10.1097/00003246-200101000-00040 · DOI
- 10.1002/nur.10005 · DOI
- 10.1053/jcrc.2001.30163 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006199-200103000-00006 · DOI
- 10.4037/ajcc2003.12.6.548 · DOI
- 10.4037/ajcc2002.11.3.200 · DOI
- 10.1097/00129191-200304000-00015 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00134-002-1569-y · DOI
- 10.1177/1049732303260501 · DOI
- 10.3928/0098-9134-20051101-08 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.04043.x · DOI
- 10.1164/rccm.200409-1295OC · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1471301205049193 · DOI
- 10.1177/0733464805275766 · DOI
- Chambers-Evans J, 2005, J Clin Ethics, 16, 28, 10.1086/JCE200516104 · DOI
- 10.1097/00129191-200507000-00013 · DOI
- 10.1177/1074840707300761 · DOI
- 10.1188/07.ONF.331-339 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11606-007-0252-y · DOI
- 10.1007/s11606-007-0487-7 · DOI
- 10.1378/chest.07-1773 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1478951508000035 · DOI
- 10.1089/jpm.2008.0015 · DOI
- 10.1136/jme.2009.030668 · DOI
- 10.1177/1049909109338515 · DOI
- 10.1080/15524256.2010.489221 · DOI
- 10.1378/chest.09-1291 · DOI
- 10.2307/3527683 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00517.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03168-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.1992.03480010067026 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03146.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1748-720X.1991.tb01803.x · DOI
- 10.1378/chest.08-0235 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.CCM.0000126895.66850.14 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00134-004-2241-5 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.CCM.0000140089.67373.0B · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM198801073180106 · DOI
- 10.1016/0163-8343(94)90004-3 · DOI
- 10.1001/archinte.161.3.431 · DOI
- 10.1001/archinte.1989.00390060091019 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-115-2-92 · DOI
- 10.1353/hcr.2010.0001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Communication About Serious Illness Care Goals: A Review and Synthesis of Best Practices
Bernacki, R. E., & Block, S. D. (2014) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271 · Cited by 1,422
Rietjens, J. A. C., Sudore, R. L., Connolly, M., van Delden, J. J., Drickamer, M. A., Droger, M., van der Heide, A., Heyland, D. K., Houttekier, D., Janssen, D. J. A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30582-x · Cited by 1,371
Family Caregiving for Older Adults
Schulz, R., Beach, S. R., Czaja, S. J., Martire, L. M., & Monin, J. K. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050754 · Cited by 754
A randomized trial of a family-support intervention in intensive care units
White, D. B., Angus, D. C., Shields, A.-M., Buddadhumaruk, P., Pidro, C., Paner, C., Chaitin, E., Chang, C.-C. H., Pike, F., Weissfeld, L., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1802637 · Cited by 524
Afram, B., Stephan, A., Verbeek, H., Bleijlevens, M. H. C., Suhonen, R., Sutcliffe, C., Raamat, K., Cabrera, E., Soto, M. E., Hallberg, I. R., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.09.012 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Wendler, D., & Rid, A.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2011-03-01
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 336-346
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2037404982
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- surrogate decision-making, incapacitated adults, emotional burden, guilt, end-of-life decisions, family caregivers, patient preferences, decision regret, grief, prognostic uncertainty
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Decision Making, Family, Guilt, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Terminal Care, Advance Directives, Caregivers, Patient Preference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review