Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 851

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty in 1985–1986 and 1977–1981

Detre, Katherine, Holubkov, Richard, Kelsey, Sheryl, Cowley, Michael, Kent, Kenneth, Williams, David, Myler, Richard, Faxon, David, Holmes, David, Bourassa, Martial, Block, Peter, Gosselin, Arthur, Bentivoglio, Lamberto, Leatherman, Louis, Dorros, Gerald, King, Spencer, Galichia, Joseph, Al-Bassam, Mahdi, Leon, Martin, Robertson, Thomas, Passamani, Eugene, The Co-investigators of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry*·1988·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

In August 1985, the Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute reopened at its previous sites to document changes in angioplasty strategy and outcome. The new registry entered 1802 consecutive patients who had not had a myocardial infarction in the 10 days before angioplasty. Patient selection, technical outcome, and short-term major complications were compared with those of the 1977 to 1981 registry cohort. The new-registry patients were older and had a significantly higher proportion of multivessel disease (53 vs. 25 percent, P less than 0.001), poor left ventricular function (19 vs. 8 percent, P less than 0.001), previous myocardial infarction (37 vs. 21 percent, P less than 0.001), and previous coronary bypass surgery (13 vs. 9 percent, P less than 0.01). The new-registry cohort also had more complex coronary lesions, and angioplasty attempts in these patients involved more multivessel procedures. Despite these differences, the in-hospital outcome in the new cohort was better. Angiographic success rates according to lesion increased from 67 to 88 percent (P less than 0.001), and overall success rates (measured as a reduction of at least 20 percent in all lesions attempted, without death, myocardial infarction, or coronary bypass surgery) increased from 61 to 78 percent (P less than 0.001). In-hospital mortality for the new cohort was 1 percent, and the nonfatal myocardial infarction rate was 4.3 percent. Both rates are similar to those for the old registry. The long-term efficacy of current angioplasty remains to be determined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198802043180501

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 851

Metadata

Authors
Detre, K., Holubkov, R., Kelsey, S., Cowley, M., Kent, K., Williams, D., Myler, R., Faxon, D., Holmes, D., Bourassa, M., Block, P., Gosselin, A., Bentivoglio, L., Leatherman, L., Dorros, G., King, S., Galichia, J., Al-Bassam, M., Leon, M., Robertson, T., Passamani, E., & The Co-investigators of the National Heart, L.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1988-02-04
Volume
318
Issue
5
Pages
265-270
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2312498426
Cited by
851
References
0
FWCI
99.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty in 1985–1986 and 1977–1981. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198802043180501
The paper
Detre, K., Holubkov, R., Kelsey, S., Cowley, M., Kent, K., Williams, D., Myler, R., Faxon, D., Holmes, D., Bourassa, M., Block, P., Gosselin, A., Bentivoglio, L., Leatherman, L., Dorros, G., King, S., Galichia, J., Al-Bassam, M., Leon, M., . . . The Co-investigators of the National Heart, L. (1988). Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty in 1985–1986 and 1977–1981. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198802043180501

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.