The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of Relapse or Survival in Patients with Node-Negative Breast Cancer by DNA Flow Cytometry
Abstract
More accurate prediction of the prognosis in women with node-negative breast cancer may improve physicians' ability to identify the patients most likely to benefit from systematic adjuvant therapy. With this in mind, we performed DNA flow-cytometric measurements of ploidy and the fraction of cells in the synthesis phase of the cell cycle (S-phase fraction) on 395 specimens of node-negative breast cancer from our bank of frozen tumors, using the aliquots of pulverized frozen tissue from steroid-receptor assays. The median duration of follow-up in patients still alive at the time of analysis was 59 months. Thirty-two percent of the 345 specimens that could be evaluated were diploid, and 68 percent were aneuploid. The probability of disease-free survival at five years was 88 +/- 3 percent in patients with diploid tumors and 74 +/- 3 percent in those with aneuploid tumors (P = 0.02). The S-phase fraction was not a significant additional predictor of disease-free survival in patients with aneuploid tumors. However, the probability of disease-free survival in patients with diploid tumors and low S-phase fractions was 90 +/- 3 percent at five years, as compared with 70 +/- 13 percent in those with diploid tumors and high S-phase fractions (P = 0.007). Similar differences in overall survival were noted. We conclude that DNA flow-cytometric measurements of ploidy and S-phase fraction can be performed on frozen specimens of tumors and are potentially important predictors of disease-free and overall survival in patients with node-negative breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Cited by
Cote, R. J., Rosen, P. P., Lesser, M. L., Old, L. J., & Osborne, M. P. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1991.9.10.1749 · Cited by 435
Significance of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Breast Cancer
Jatoi, I., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Clark, G. M., & Osborne, C. K. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.8.2334 · Cited by 299
Self-citationImpact of axillary lymph node dissection on the therapy of breast cancer patients.
Lin, P. P., Allison, D. C., Wainstock, J., Miller, K. D., Dooley, W. C., Friedman, N., & Baker, R. R. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1993.11.8.1536 · Cited by 277
Time-dependence of hazard ratios for prognostic factors in primary breast cancer
Hilsenbeck, S. G., Ravdin, P. M., de Moor, C. A., Chamness, G. C., Osborne, C. K., & Clark, G. M. (1998) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1023/a:1006133418245 · Cited by 237
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, G. M., Dressler, L. G., Owens, M. A., Pounds, G., Oldaker, T., & McGuire, W. L.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1989-03-09
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 627-633
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2328982008
- Cited by
- 558
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 43.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Relapse or Survival in Patients with Node-Negative Breast Cancer by DNA Flow Cytometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198903093201003
- The paper
- Clark, G. M., Dressler, L. G., Owens, M. A., Pounds, G., Oldaker, T., & McGuire, W. L. (1989). Prediction of Relapse or Survival in Patients with Node-Negative Breast Cancer by DNA Flow Cytometry. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198903093201003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.