The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Significance of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Breast Cancer
Abstract
PURPOSE: Axillary lymph node status is the single most important prognostic variable in the management of patients with primary breast cancer. Yet, it is not known whether metastasis to the axillary nodes is simply a time-dependent variable or also a marker for a more aggressive tumor phenotype. The purpose of this study was to determine whether nodal status at initial diagnosis predicts outcome after relapse and therefore also serves as a marker of breast cancer phenotype. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Survival experience after first relapse in 1,696 primary breast cancer cases was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. The following explanatory variables and their first-order interactions were considered: number of axillary lymph nodes involved (zero v one to three v four or more), hormone receptor status (any estrogen receptor [ER] negativity v ER negativity/progesterone receptor positivity v other ER positivity), primary tumor size (< 2 cm v 2 to 5 cm v > 5 cm), site of relapse (locoregional v distant), disease-free interval (< 1.5 years v 1.5 to 3 years v > 3 years), adjuvant endocrine therapy (none v any), adjuvant chemotherapy (none v any), and menopausal status (pre-, peri-, or postmenopausal). RESULTS: Axillary lymph node status, site of relapse, and hormone receptor status were all highly significant as main effects in the model. After adjustment for other variables, disease-free interval alone was only modestly significant but interacted with nodal status. After disease-free interval, hormone receptor status, and site of relapse were accounted for, survival after relapse was poorer in node-positive cases, when compared with node-negative cases. The hazard ratios for patients with one to three and four or more involved nodes were 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 1.9) and 2.5 (95% CI, 1.8 to 3.4), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with four or more involved nodes at initial diagnosis have a significantly worse outcome after relapse than node-negative cases, regardless of the duration of the disease-free interval. We conclude that nodal metastasis is not only a marker of diagnosis at a later point in the natural history of breast cancer but also a marker of an aggressive phenotype.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Cox, D. R., & Oakes, D. (2018) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315137438 · Cited by 6,234
Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals
GRAMBSCH, P. M., & THERNEAU, T. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.515 · Cited by 5,885
REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY
Tabár, L., Gad, A., Holmberg, L. H., Ljungquist, U., Fagerberg, C. J. G., Baldetorp, L., Gröntoft, O., Lundström, B., Månson, J. C., Eklund, G., et al. (1985) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92204-4 · Cited by 1,781
Fisher, B., Redmond, C., Fisher, E. R., Bauer, M., Wolmark, N., Wickerham, D. L., Deutsch, M., Montague, E., Margolese, R., & Foster, R. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198503143121102 · Cited by 1,376
Martingale-based residuals for survival models
THERNEAU, T. M., GRAMBSCH, P. M., & FLEMING, T. R. (1990) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/77.1.147 · Cited by 1,099
Prediction of Relapse or Survival in Patients with Node-Negative Breast Cancer by DNA Flow Cytometry
Clark, G. M., Dressler, L. G., Owens, M. A., Pounds, G., Oldaker, T., & McGuire, W. L. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198903093201003 · Cited by 558
Self-citationClark, G. M., Sledge, G. W., Osborne, C. K., & McGuire, W. L. (1987) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1987.5.1.55 · Cited by 374
Self-citation
Cited by
The IL-6/JAK/Stat3 feed-forward loop drives tumorigenesis and metastasis
Chang, Q., Bournazou, E., Sansone, P., Berishaj, M., Gao, S. P., Daly, L., Wels, J., Theilen, T., Granitto, S., Zhang, X., et al. (2013) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1593/neo.13706 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Jatoi, I., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Clark, G. M., & Osborne, C. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2334-2334
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2129487338
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significance of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1999.17.8.2334
- The paper
- Jatoi, I., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Clark, G. M., & Osborne, C. K. (1999). Significance of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.8.2334
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.