Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

bcl-2 and Other Genomic Alterations in the Prognosis of Large-Cell Lymphoma

Yunis, Jorge J., Mayer, Mary G., Arnesen, Mark A., Aeppli, Dorothee P., Oken, Martin M., Frizzera, Glauco·1989·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Approximately half the patients with diffuse or follicular large-cell or mixed large- and small-cell lymphoma enter a prolonged remission or are cured after receiving combined-drug therapy. It has been unclear, however, why the other half do not respond. We evaluated 54 previously untreated patients with diffuse lymphoma and 20 with follicular lymphoma, all of whom had a large-cell component and Stage II through IV disease, subsequently treated with combined chemotherapy. Different recurrent genomic defects were associated with differences in the response to treatment. Among the 54 patients with diffuse lymphoma, all 12 patients with a duplication of chromosome 3p had a complete clinical remission after a median follow-up of 39 months (11 patients survived). In contrast, all seven patients with a duplication of chromosome 2p had a partial response or no response to treatment and a median survival of six months (all died). Among the 20 patients with follicular lymphoma, all 5 patients with duplication 3p or +3 had a complete clinical remission (all survived), and 3 of 4 patients with duplication 2p or +2 had no response or a partial response to treatment and died. Twenty-three patients with B-cell non-immunoblastic lymphoma or follicular lymphoma who had a bcl-2 oncogene rearrangement had a poorer response to therapy (7 of 23 with complete remission) than the patients without bcl-2 rearrangement (21 of 26 with complete remission). We conclude that in large-cell or mixed-cell lymphoma, duplication of chromosome 3p is associated with a relatively good prognosis and duplication of chromosome 2p or bcl-2 oncogene rearrangement is associated with a relatively poor prognosis. Because such multiple recurrent genomic defects are also common in most other types of cancer, they may have general prognostic importance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198904203201605

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Yunis, J. J., Mayer, M. G., Arnesen, M. A., Aeppli, D. P., Oken, M. M., & Frizzera, G.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1989-04-20
Volume
320
Issue
16
Pages
1047-1054
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1966059563
Cited by
292
References
0
FWCI
16.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: bcl-2 and Other Genomic Alterations in the Prognosis of Large-Cell Lymphoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198904203201605
The paper
Yunis, J. J., Mayer, M. G., Arnesen, M. A., Aeppli, D. P., Oken, M. M., & Frizzera, G. (1989). bcl-2 and Other Genomic Alterations in the Prognosis of Large-Cell Lymphoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198904203201605

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.