Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 668

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immunologic Purging of Marrow Assessed by PCR before Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation for B-Cell Lymphoma

Open access
Gribben, John G., Freedman, Arnold S., Neuberg, Donna, Roy, Denis C., Blake, Kelly W., Woo, Sunhee D., Grossbard, Michael L., Rabinowe, Susan N., Coral, Felice, Freeman, Gordon J., Ritz, Jerome, Nadler, Lee M.·1991·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of autologous bone marrow transplantation is increasing in the management of advanced cancers. Many investigators have attempted to "purge" autologous marrow of residual tumor cells because of concern that reinfused tumor cells might contribute to relapse. The efficacy of purging remains unproved. METHODS: We performed clonogenic assays in a tumor cell line in culture to determine the efficiency of immunologic purging. Amplification by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect residual lymphoma cells before and after purging of bone marrow from 114 patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in whom a translocation (t(14;18] that could be amplified by PCR was detected at the time of their initial evaluation. RESULTS: Immunologic purging in vitro resulted in a 3-to-6-log destruction of cells in the tumor cell line. Residual lymphoma cells were detected by PCR in the bone marrow of all patients before purging. No lymphoma cells could be detected in the marrow of 57 patients after purging. Disease-free survival was increased in these 57 patients as compared with those whose marrow contained detectable residual lymphoma (P less than 0.00001). The ability to purge residual lymphoma cells was not associated with the degree of bone marrow involvement (P = 0.4494) or the previous response to therapy (P = 0.1298). CONCLUSIONS: The inability to purge residual lymphoma cells was the most important prognostic indicator in predicting relapse. These results provide evidence of the clinical usefulness of ex vivo purging of autologous bone marrow in the treatment of patients with lymphoma and suggest that the reinfusion of malignant cells in autologous marrow contributes to relapse

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199111283252201

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 668

Metadata

Authors
Gribben, J. G., Freedman, A. S., Neuberg, D., Roy, D. C., Blake, K. W., Woo, S. D., Grossbard, M. L., Rabinowe, S. N., Coral, F., Freeman, G. J., Ritz, J., & Nadler, L. M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1991-11-28
Volume
325
Issue
22
Pages
1525-1533
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2324339443
Cited by
668
References
23
FWCI
30.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunologic Purging of Marrow Assessed by PCR before Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation for B-Cell Lymphoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199111283252201
The paper
Gribben, J. G., Freedman, A. S., Neuberg, D., Roy, D. C., Blake, K. W., Woo, S. D., Grossbard, M. L., Rabinowe, S. N., Coral, F., Freeman, G. J., Ritz, J., & Nadler, L. M. (1991). Immunologic Purging of Marrow Assessed by PCR before Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation for B-Cell Lymphoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199111283252201

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.