The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intrathecal Baclofen for Severe Spinal Spasticity
Abstract
We studied the effect of the intrathecal infusion of baclofen, an agonist of gamma-aminobutyric acid, on abnormal muscle tone and spasms associated with spinal spasticity, in a randomized double-blind crossover study. Twenty patients with spinal spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis or spinal-cord injury who had had no response to treatment with oral baclofen received an intrathecal infusion of baclofen or saline for three days. The infusions were administered by means of a programmable pump implanted in the lumbar subarachnoid space. Muscle tone decreased in all 20 patients (mean [+/- SD] Ashworth score for rigidity, from 4.0 +/- 1.0 to 1.2 +/- 0.4; P less than 0.0001), and spasms were decreased in 18 of the 19 patients who had spasms (mean [+/- SD] score for spasm frequency, from 3.3 +/- 1.2 to 0.4 +/- 0.8; P less than 0.0005). Tests for motor function, neurologic examination, and assessments by the patients correctly indicated when baclofen was being infused in all cases. All patients were then entered in an open long-term trial of continuous infusion of intrathecal baclofen. During a mean follow-up period of 19.2 months (range, 10 to 33), muscle tone has been maintained within the normal range (mean Ashworth score, 1.0 +/- 0.1) and spasms have been reduced to a level that does not interfere with activities of daily living (mean spasm score, 0.3 +/- 0.6). No drowsiness or confusion occurred, one pump failed, and two catheters became dislodged and had to be replaced. No infections were observed. Our observations suggest that intrathecal baclofen is an effective long-term treatment for spinal spasticity that has not responded to oral baclofen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bowery, N. G., Bettler, B., Froestl, W., Gallagher, J. P., Marshall, F., Raiteri, M., Bonner, T. I., & Enna, S. J. (2002) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.54.2.247 · Cited by 601
Treatment of spasticity with botulinum toxin: A double‐blind study
Snow, B. J., Tsui, J. K. C., Bhatt, M. H., Varelas, M., Hashimoto, S. A., & Calne, D. B. (1990) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410280407 · Cited by 414
What are “normal movements” in atypical populations?
Latash, M. L., & Anson, J. G. (1996) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00041467 · Cited by 331
Self-citationObjective quantification of spastic hypertonia: Correlation with clinical findings
Katz, R. T., Rovai, G. P., Brait, C., & Rymer, W. Z. (1992) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/0003-9993(92)90007-j · Cited by 314
Treatments for spasticity and pain in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review
Beard, S., Hunn, A., & Wight, J. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7400 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Penn, R. D., Savoy, S. M., Corcos, D., Latash, M., Gottlieb, G., Parke, B., & Kroin, J. S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1989-06-08
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 1517-1521
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2325472161
- Cited by
- 754
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrathecal Baclofen for Severe Spinal Spasticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198906083202303
- The paper
- Penn, R. D., Savoy, S. M., Corcos, D., Latash, M., Gottlieb, G., Parke, B., & Kroin, J. S. (1989). Intrathecal Baclofen for Severe Spinal Spasticity. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198906083202303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.