Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oncogenic Point Mutations in the Human Retinoblastoma Gene: Their Application to Genetic Counseling

Yandell, David W., Campbell, Tracey A., Dayton, Siri H., Petersen, Robert, Walton, David, Little, John B., McConkie-Rosell, Allyn, Buckley, Edward G., Dryja, Thaddeus P.·1989·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Mutations of the retinoblastoma gene, most of which cannot be detected by conventional Southern blotting, are known to cause both the nonhereditary and hereditary forms of retinoblastoma and have been implicated in the development of other cancers. Nonhereditary retinoblastoma is caused by a somatic mutation. Hereditary retinoblastoma is caused by a germ-cell mutation, most often a new one, and thus there is usually no family history of the disease. Unlike patients with the nonhereditary disease, those with the hereditary form are at risk for additional retinoblastomas, and their progeny are at risk for the tumors. We used a sensitive technique of primer-directed enzymatic amplification, followed by DNA sequence analysis, to identify mutations as small as a single nucleotide change in tumors from seven patients with simplex retinoblastoma (with no family history of the disease). In four patients the mutation involved only the tumor cells, and in three it involved normal somatic cells as well as tumor cells but was not found in either parent; thus, these mutations appeared to be new, germ-cell mutations. In addition, we found point mutations in cells from a bladder carcinoma, a small-cell carcinoma of the lung, and another retinoblastoma. We conclude that the technique that we have described can distinguish hereditary from nonhereditary retinoblastoma and that it is useful in risk estimation and genetic counseling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198912213212501

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Yandell, D. W., Campbell, T. A., Dayton, S. H., Petersen, R., Walton, D., Little, J. B., McConkie-Rosell, A., Buckley, E. G., & Dryja, T. P.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1989-12-21
Volume
321
Issue
25
Pages
1689-1695
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2046556570
Cited by
274
References
43
FWCI
41.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oncogenic Point Mutations in the Human Retinoblastoma Gene: Their Application to Genetic Counseling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198912213212501
The paper
Yandell, D. W., Campbell, T. A., Dayton, S. H., Petersen, R., Walton, D., Little, J. B., McConkie-Rosell, A., Buckley, E. G., & Dryja, T. P. (1989). Oncogenic Point Mutations in the Human Retinoblastoma Gene: Their Application to Genetic Counseling. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198912213212501

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.