Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Herniorrhaphy and Breast Surgery

Open access
Platt, R., Zaleznik, D.F., Hopkins, C.C., Dellinger, E.P., Karchmer, A.W., Bryan, C.S., Burke, J.F., Wikler, M.A., Marino, S.K., Holbrook, K.F., Tosteson, T.D., Segal, M.R.·1990·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

We assessed the efficacy of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery in a randomized, double-blind trial of 1218 patients undergoing herniorrhaphy or surgery involving the breast, including excision of a breast mass, mastectomy, reduction mammoplasty, and axillary-node dissection. The prophylactic regimen was a single dose of cefonicid (1 g intravenously) administered approximately half an hour before surgery. The patients were followed up for four to six weeks after surgery. Blinding was maintained until the last patient completed the follow-up and all diagnoses of infection had been made. The patients who received prophylaxis had 48 percent fewer probable or definite infections than those who did not (Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio, 0.52; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.84; P = 0.01). For patients undergoing a procedure involving the breast, infection occurred in 6.6 percent of the cefonicid recipients (20 of 303) and 12.2 percent of the placebo recipients (37 of 303); for those undergoing herniorrhaphy, infection occurred in 2.3 percent of the cefonicid recipients (7 of 301) and 4.2 percent of the placebo recipients (13 of 311). There were comparable reductions in the numbers of definite wound infections (Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio, 0.49), wounds that drained pus (risk ratio, 0.43), Staphylococcus aureus wound isolates (risk ratio, 0.49), and urinary tract infections (risk ratio, 0.40). There were also comparable reductions in the need for postoperative antibiotic therapy, non-routine visits to a physician for problems involving wound healing, incision and drainage procedures, and readmission because of problems with wound healing. We conclude that perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with cefonicid is useful for herniorrhaphy and certain types of breast surgery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199001183220303

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Platt, R., Zaleznik, D. F., Hopkins, C. C., Dellinger, E. P., Karchmer, A. W., Bryan, C. S., Burke, J. F., Wikler, M. A., Marino, S. K., Holbrook, K. F., Tosteson, T. D., & Segal, M. R.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1990-01-18
Volume
322
Issue
3
Pages
153-160
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2320358601
Cited by
365
References
8
FWCI
22.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Herniorrhaphy and Breast Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199001183220303
The paper
Platt, R., Zaleznik, D. F., Hopkins, C. C., Dellinger, E. P., Karchmer, A. W., Bryan, C. S., Burke, J. F., Wikler, M. A., Marino, S. K., Holbrook, K. F., Tosteson, T. D., & Segal, M. R. (1990). Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Herniorrhaphy and Breast Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199001183220303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.