Cited by 5,688Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesSurgical site infection prevention

A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population

Open access
Haynes, Alex B., Weiser, Thomas G., Berry, William R., Lipsitz, Stuart R., Breizat, Abdel-Hadi S., Dellinger, E. Patchen, Herbosa, Teodoro, Joseph, Sudhir +7 more·2009·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgery has become an integral part of global health care, with an estimated 234 million operations performed yearly. Surgical complications are common and often preventable. We hypothesized that a program to implement a 19-item surgical safety checklist designed to improve team communication and consistency of care would reduce complications and deaths associated with surgery. METHODS: Between October 2007 and September 2008, eight hospitals in eight cities (Toronto, Canada; New Delhi, India; Amman, Jordan; Auckland, New Zealand; Manila, Philippines; Ifakara, Tanzania; London, England; and Seattle, WA) representing a variety of economic circumstances and diverse populations of patients participated in the World Health Organization's Safe Surgery Saves Lives program. We prospectively collected data on clinical processes and outcomes from 3733 consecutively enrolled patients 16 years of age or older who were undergoing noncardiac surgery. We subsequently collected data on 3955 consecutively enrolled patients after the introduction of the Surgical Safety Checklist. The primary end point was the rate of complications, including death, during hospitalization within the first 30 days after the operation. RESULTS: The rate of death was 1.5% before the checklist was introduced and declined to 0.8% afterward (P=0.003). Inpatient complications occurred in 11.0% of patients at baseline and in 7.0% after introduction of the checklist (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the checklist was associated with concomitant reductions in the rates of death and complications among patients at least 16 years of age who were undergoing noncardiac surgery in a diverse group of hospitals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsa0810119

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous successful patient-safety interventions have used a bundled approach.

    “We chose to combine several educational and process changes into a single bundled intervention because numerous successful patient-safety interventions have used this approach.1,2,40”
  • Routine use of surgical safety checklists can reduce perioperative complications.

    “The routine use of surgical safety checklists can reduce perioperative complications.”
  • Surgical safety checklists have been shown to reduce serious perioperative complications and death by 30% to 40% when implemented across a wide range of hospital settings.

    “Surgical safety checklists, such as the one developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), 2 have been shown to reduce serious perioperative complications and death by 30% to 40% when implemented across a wide range of hospital settings.3,4”
  • Studies demonstrating reduced morbidity and mortality with the use of a surgical safety checklist include detailed implementation programs involving extensive staff engagement and education.

    “Studies demonstrating reduced morbidity and mortality with the use of a surgical safety checklist include detailed implementation programs involving extensive staff engagement and education.3,4,9”
  • This problem may help to explain apparently contradictory findings about the value of surgical checklists.

    “This problem may help to explain apparently contradictory findings about the value of surgical checklists, for example.47–49”

    From Demystifying theory and its use in improvement (2015) · cites this paper as [47]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]9. Ouro-Bang'na Maman AF, Tomta K, 9. Ahouangbévi S, Chobli M. Deaths associ- ated with anaesthesia in Togo, West Afri- ca. Trop Doct 2005;35:220-2.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haynes, A. B., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., Lipsitz, S. R., Breizat, A.-H. S., Dellinger, E. P., Herbosa, T., Joseph, S., Kibatala, P. L., Lapitan, M. C. M., Merry, A. F., Moorthy, K., Reznick, R. K., Taylor, B., & Gawande, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Ministry of Health (JO)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of the Philippines Manila (PH)
  • St. Stephen’s Hospital (IN)
  • St. Francis Referral Hospital (TZ)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2009-01-29
Volume
360
Issue
5
Pages
491-499
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2119472226
Cited by
5,688
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 256 · 2025: 215 · 2024: 256 · 2023: 247 · 2022: 325 · 2021: 335 · 2020: 337 · 2019: 336 · 2018: 340 · 2017: 362 · 2016: 349 · 2015: 406 · 2014: 405 · 2013: 372 · 2012: 363
FWCI
514.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
Keywords
surgical safety checklist, surgical complications, postoperative mortality, non-cardiac surgery, team communication, patient safety, checklist implementation, global health care, in-hospital complications
MeSH terms
Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Safety Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review