Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 456

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cathepsin D and Prognosis in Breast Cancer

Open access
Tandon, Atul K., Clark, Gary M., Chamness, Gary C., Chirgwin, John M., McGuire, William L.·1990·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

We investigated the possibility that cathepsin D, an estrogen-induced lysosomal protease, might have value as a prognostic factor in breast cancer by studying frozen tissue specimens from 397 patients. We measured the 34-kd mature form of the enzyme by Western blot assay and densitometry. Among 199 patients with node-negative disease, but not among 198 with node-positive disease, high levels of cathepsin D proved to be a significant predictor of reduced disease-free survival (median follow-up, 64 months), either as a continuous variable (log cathepsin D; P = 0.018) or as a dichotomous variable with an optimized cutoff point (P = 0.0001). Results were similar for overall survival (P = 0.009 and 0.0001, respectively). Relating the level of cathepsin D to other prognostic factors in the patients with node-negative disease, we found an association with aneuploidy but none with estrogen or progesterone receptors, tumor size, or the age of the patient. In multivariate analyses, a high level of cathepsin D was the most important independent factor in predicting shorter disease-free and overall survival in patients with node-negative disease. As compared with the risk in women with low levels of cathepsin D, the relative risk of tumor recurrence was 2.6 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 4.4) and the relative risk of death was 3.9 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.1 to 7.3) among those with high levels of cathepsin D. For disease-free survival, cathepsin D status was predictive of outcome primarily among those with aneuploid tumors; the actuarial five-year recurrence rates of aneuploid tumors were 60 percent among women with high levels of cathepsin D and 29 percent among those with low levels, as compared with 22 percent for all diploid tumors. We conclude that cathepsin D may be an independent predictor of early recurrence and death in node-negative breast cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199002013220504

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 456

Metadata

Authors
Tandon, A. K., Clark, G. M., Chamness, G. C., Chirgwin, J. M., & McGuire, W. L.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1990-02
Volume
322
Issue
5
Pages
297-302
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2326165980
Cited by
456
References
2
FWCI
32.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cathepsin D and Prognosis in Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199002013220504
The paper
Tandon, A. K., Clark, G. M., Chamness, G. C., Chirgwin, J. M., & McGuire, W. L. (1990). Cathepsin D and Prognosis in Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199002013220504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.