Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Strategy for Quality Assurance in Medicare

Open access
Lohr, Kathleen N., Schroeder, Steven A.·1990·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences has just released a report on quality assurance for the Medicare program.1 The legislation authorizing the study called for an ambitious and far-reaching strategic plan for assessing and ensuring the quality of medical care for elderly people during the next decade. The deliberations and fact finding of the study's 17-member committee included the review of commissioned and staff-produced papers, public hearings, panels, site visits, focus groups, and many meetings. The resulting report indicates that although the current quality of medical care for Medicare enrollees is not bad, it could be . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199003083221031

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Lohr, K. N., & Schroeder, S. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1990-03-08
Volume
322
Issue
10
Pages
707-712
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2025243882
Cited by
345
References
0
FWCI
35.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Strategy for Quality Assurance in Medicare. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199003083221031
The paper
Lohr, K. N., & Schroeder, S. A. (1990). A Strategy for Quality Assurance in Medicare. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199003083221031

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.