Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 549

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Second Neoplasms after Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Childhood

Open access
Neglia, Joseph P., Meadows, Anna T., Robison, Leslie L., Kim, Tae H., Newton, William A., Ruymann, Frederick B., Sather, Harland N., Hammond, G. Denman·1991·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective forms of treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in childhood now result in survival rates above 70 percent at five years, but the treatments are potentially carcinogenic. To determine the magnitude of this risk and identify possible risk factors for the development of second neoplasms, we studied a large cohort of children treated for ALL. METHODS AND RESULTS. We undertook a retrospective cohort study of 9720 children who had been given a diagnosis of ALL between June 1972 and August 1988 and had been treated according to the therapeutic protocols of the Children's Cancer Study Group. The median follow-up was 4.7 years (range, 2 months to 16 years). We found that 43 second neoplasms occurred among the children in the cohort, including 24 neoplasms of the central nervous system, 10 new leukemias and lymphomas, and 9 other neoplasms. This represented a 7-fold excess of all cancers and a 22-fold excess of neoplasms of the central nervous system. The estimated cumulative proportion of children in whom a second neoplasm developed was 2.53 percent 15 years after diagnosis (95 percent confidence limits, 1.74 percent and 3.38 percent). An even higher risk, particularly of central nervous system tumors, was evident in children five years of age or less at the time of the diagnosis of ALL (P = 0.012). All central nervous system neoplasms developed in children who had previously undergone irradiation. There was no association with exposure to cyclophosphamide or anthracyclines. CONCLUSIONS: There is a substantial excess of second neoplasms, especially of the central nervous system, among children treated for ALL. Children five years old or younger and those receiving radiation are at higher risk, especially for second tumors arising in the central nervous system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199111073251902

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 549

Metadata

Authors
Neglia, J. P., Meadows, A. T., Robison, L. L., Kim, T. H., Newton, W. A., Ruymann, F. B., Sather, H. N., & Hammond, G. D.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1991-11-07
Volume
325
Issue
19
Pages
1330-1336
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2320188351
Cited by
549
References
2
FWCI
18.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second Neoplasms after Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Childhood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199111073251902
The paper
Neglia, J. P., Meadows, A. T., Robison, L. L., Kim, T. H., Newton, W. A., Ruymann, F. B., Sather, H. N., & Hammond, G. D. (1991). Second Neoplasms after Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Childhood. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199111073251902

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.