The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Controlled Trial in Intensive Care Units of Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract with Nonabsorbable Antibiotics
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Selective decontamination of the digestive tract with topical nonabsorbable antibiotics has been reported to prevent nosocomial infections in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, and the procedure is used widely in Europe. However, it is unclear whether selective decontamination improves survival. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind multicenter study in which 445 patients receiving mechanical ventilation in 15 intensive care units were given either prophylactic nonabsorbable antibiotics (n = 220) or a placebo (n = 225). Topical antibiotics (tobramycin, colistin sulfate, and amphotericin B) or a placebo was administered through a nasogastric tube and applied to the oropharynx throughout the period of ventilation. The main end points were the mortality rate in the intensive care unit and within 60 days of randomization. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients died in the intensive care unit; 75 (34 percent) in the treatment group and 67 (30 percent) in the placebo group (P = 0.37). Mortality within 60 days of randomization was similar in the two groups (P = 0.40), even after adjustment for factors that were either unbalanced or individually predictive of survival in the two groups (P = 0.70). Pneumonia developed in 59 patients (13 percent) in the intensive care unit within 30 days of enrollment in the study (33 in the placebo group and 26 in the treatment group, P = 0.42). Pneumonia acquired in the intensive care unit and due to gram-negative bacilli was less frequent (P = 0.01) in the treatment group than in the placebo group. The total charges for antibiotics were 2.2 times higher in the treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Selective decontamination of the digestive tract does not improve survival among patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit, although it substantially increases the cost of their care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures
Peto, R., & Peto, J. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344317 · Cited by 3,393
DUMOULIN, G. (1982) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(82)90974-6 · Cited by 468
Cited by
Le Gall, J.-R. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.270.24.2957 · Cited by 7,773
The gastrointestinal tract. The “undrained abscess” of multiple organ failure
Marshall, J. C., Christou, N. V., & Meakins, J. L. (1993) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199308000-00001 · Cited by 707
Daneman, N., Sarwar, S., Fowler, R. A., & Cuthbertson, B. H. (2013) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(12)70322-5 · Cited by 288
Silvestri, L., de la Cal, M. A., & van Saene, H. K. F. (2012) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2690-1 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Gastinne, H., Wolff, M., Delatour, F., Faurisson, F., & Chevret, S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1992-02-27
- Volume
- 326
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 594-599
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2338387209
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Controlled Trial in Intensive Care Units of Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract with Nonabsorbable Antibiotics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199202273260903
- The paper
- Gastinne, H., Wolff, M., Delatour, F., Faurisson, F., & Chevret, S. (1992). A Controlled Trial in Intensive Care Units of Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract with Nonabsorbable Antibiotics. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199202273260903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.