The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Risk of Subarachnoid and Intracerebral Hemorrhages in Blacks as Compared with Whites
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Stroke is an important cause of death among blacks, and intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhages account for nearly half of all early deaths from stroke. The present study investigates whether blacks and whites differ in their risk of having either intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records, autopsy reports, and CT scans of all patients suspected of having had an intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage during 1988 among the nearly 1.3 million people in the Greater Cincinnati metropolitan area. RESULTS: There were 221 cases of first spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage among 1,086,462 whites (159 intracerebral and 62 subarachnoid hemorrhages), and 45 cases among 171,718 blacks (27 intracerebral and 18 subarachnoid hemorrhages). Blacks had 2.1 times the risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage of whites (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.6) and 1.4 times the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 2.1). In those under the age of 75, the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage among blacks was 2.3 times that of whites (95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 3.6), whereas the risk among blacks 75 or older was one fourth that of whites (95 percent confidence interval, 0.1 to 0.8). Deaths within 30 days of intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage accounted for 1.9 years of life lost per 1000 blacks under 65 years of age, as compared with 0.5 year per 1000 whites. CONCLUSIONS: Young and middle-aged blacks have a substantially higher risk of subarachnoid or intracerebral hemorrhage than whites of similar age. These types of stroke are important causes of excess mortality among young and middle-aged blacks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
Qureshi, A. I., Tuhrim, S., Broderick, J. P., Batjer, H. H., Hondo, H., & Hanley, D. F. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105103441907 · Cited by 1,719
Self-citationCarnethon, M. R., Pu, J., Howard, G., Albert, M. A., Anderson, C. A. M., Bertoni, A. G., Mujahid, M. S., Palaniappan, L., Taylor, H. A., Willis, M., et al. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000534 · Cited by 1,147
Cocaine use and risk of stroke: A systematic review
Sordo, L., Indave, B. I., Barrio, G., Degenhardt, L., de la Fuente, L., & Bravo, M. J. (2014) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.06.041 · Cited by 127
Marini, S., Crawford, K., Morotti, A., Lee, M. J., Pezzini, A., Moomaw, C. J., Flaherty, M. L., Montaner, J., Roquer, J., Jimenez-Conde, J., et al. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4519 · Cited by 68
Birkeland, P., Gardner, K., Kesse-Adu, R., Davies, J., Lauritsen, J., Rom Poulsen, F., Tolias, C. M., & Thein, S. L. (2016) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.116.012664 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Broderick, J. P., Brott, T., Tomsick, T., Huster, G., & Miller, R.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1992-03-12
- Volume
- 326
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 733-736
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2333592939
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.