Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cancer in the Contralateral Breast after Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

Open access
Boice, John D., Harvey, Elizabeth B., Blettner, Maria, Stovall, Marilyn, Flannery, John T.·1992·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer have a threefold increase in the risk that a second breast cancer will develop. Radiation treatment for the initial cancer can result in moderately high doses to the contralateral breast, possibly contributing to this heightened risk. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study in a cohort of 41,109 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1935 and 1982 in Connecticut. We reviewed the medical records of 655 women in whom a second breast cancer developed five or more years after the initial tumor and compared their radiation exposure with that of 1189 matched controls from the cohort who did not have a second cancer. The dose of radiation to the contralateral breast was estimated from the original radiotherapy records. Among the exposed women, the average radiation dose to the contralateral breast was 2.82 Gy (maximum, 7.10). RESULTS: Overall, 23 percent of the women who had a second breast cancer and 20 percent of the controls had received radiotherapy (relative risk of a second breast cancer associated with radiotherapy, 1.19). Among women who survived for at least 10 years, radiation treatment was associated with a small but marginally significant elevation in the risk of a second breast cancer (relative risk, 1.33); the risk increased significantly with the dose of radiation. An increase in risk in association with radiotherapy was evident only among women who were under 45 years of age when they were treated (relative risk, 1.59) and not among older women (relative risk, 1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy for breast cancer contributes little to the already high risk of a second cancer in the opposite breast. Fewer than 3 percent of all second breast cancers in this study could be attributed to previous radiation treatment; the risk, however, was significantly increased among women who underwent irradiation at a relatively young age (less than 45 years). Radiation exposure after the age of 45 entails little, if any, risk of radiation-induced breast cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199203193261201

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Boring, 1991, CA, 41, 19
  2. 10.1001/jama.265.3.391 · doi:10.1001/jama.265.3.391 · Paper page
  3. Tercilla, 1989, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 17, 205, 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90390-8 · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(89)90390-8
  4. 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90179-8 · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(85)90179-8
  5. 10.1038/bjc.1985.196 · doi:10.1038/bjc.1985.196
  6. 10.2307/3577890 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1118/1.596331 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0010-4809(81)90031-8 · DOI
  9. Whittemore, 1983, Am J Epidemiol, 117, 76, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113518 · DOI
  10. Henderson IC, Harris JR, Kinne DW, Hellman S. Cancer of the breast. In: DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1989:1197–268.
  11. 10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:14+<1427::AID-CNCR2820661420>3.0.CO;2-W · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:14+<1427::aid-cncr2820661420>3.0.co;2-w
  12. 10.1056/NEJM198903303201302 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1002/1097-0142(197505)35:5<1472::AID-CNCR2820350536>3.0.CO;2-M · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(197505)35:5<1472::aid-cncr2820350536>3.0.co;2-m
  14. 10.1002/1097-0142(19820915)50:6<1191::AID-CNCR2820500628>3.0.CO;2-F · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19820915)50:6<1191::aid-cncr2820500628>3.0.co;2-f
  15. Burns, 1984, Can Med Assoc J, 130, 881
  16. 10.1002/1097-0142(19880715)62:2<412::AID-CNCR2820620228>3.0.CO;2-3 · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19880715)62:2<412::aid-cncr2820620228>3.0.co;2-3
  17. 10.1097/00000421-198906000-00007 · doi:10.1097/00000421-198906000-00007
  18. Hankey, 1983, J Natl Cancer Inst, 70, 797
  19. 10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3+<700::AID-CNCR2820531318>3.0.CO;2-2 · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3+<700::aid-cncr2820531318>3.0.co;2-2
  20. Zucali, 1987, Eur J Surg Oncol, 13, 413
  21. 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)90005-0 · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(98)90005-0
  22. 10.1056/NEJM198911093211902 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Shore, 1986, J Nati Cancer Inst, 77, 689, 10.1093/jnci/77.3.689 · doi:10.1093/jnci/77.3.689
  24. 10.2307/3577254 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1002/ijc.2910440103 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/1097-0142(197712)40:6<2905::AID-CNCR2820400621>3.0.CO;2-Y · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(197712)40:6<2905::aid-cncr2820400621>3.0.co;2-y
  27. Shellabarger CJ, Stone JP, Holtzman S. Experimental carcinogenesis in the breast. In: Upton achéal. Albert RE, Burns FJ, Shore RE, eds. Radiation carcinogenesis. New York: Elsevier, 1986:169–80.
  28. 10.1002/1097-0142(19910401)67:7<1844::AID-CNCR2820670705>3.0.CO;2-W · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19910401)67:7<1844::aid-cncr2820670705>3.0.co;2-w

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Boice, J. D., Harvey, E. B., Blettner, M., Stovall, M., & Flannery, J. T.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1992-03-19
Volume
326
Issue
12
Pages
781-785
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1976420723
Cited by
432
References
0
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer in the Contralateral Breast after Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199203193261201
The paper
Boice, J. D., Harvey, E. B., Blettner, M., Stovall, M., & Flannery, J. T. (1992). Cancer in the Contralateral Breast after Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199203193261201

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.