Cited by 382Radiation Dose and ImagingEffects of Radiation ExposureRadioactivity and Radon Measurements

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CANCER RISKS FROM MEDICAL RADIATION

Ron, Elaine·2003·Health Physics

Abstract

About 15% of the ionizing radiation exposure to the general public comes from artificial sources, and almost all of this exposure is due to medical radiation, largely from diagnostic procedures. Of the approximately 3 mSv annual global per caput effective dose estimated for the year 2000, 2.4 mSv is from natural background and 0.4 mSv from diagnostic medical exams. Diagnostic and therapeutic radiation was used in patients as early as 1896. Since then, continual improvements in diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy as well as the aging of our population have led to greater use of medical radiation. Temporal trends indicate that worldwide population exposure from medical radiation is increasing. In the United States, there has been a steady rise in the use of diagnostic radiologic procedures, especially x rays. Radiotherapy also has increased so that today about 40% of cancer patients receive some treatment with radiation. Epidemiologic data on medically irradiated populations are an important complement to the atomic-bomb survivors' studies. Significant improvement in cancer treatment over the last few decades has resulted in longer survival and a growing number of radiation-related second cancers. Following high-dose radiotherapy for malignant diseases, elevated risks of a variety of radiation-related second cancers have been observed. Risks have been particularly high following treatment for childhood cancer. Radiation treatment for benign disease was relatively common from th…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004032-200307000-00011

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chest radiographs are the most commonly performed imaging test and are acquired during the course of many patients' clinical workup at low cost and radiation dose.

    “Chest radiographs are the most commonly performed imaging test(9) and are acquired during the course of many patients’ clinical workup at low cost(23) and radiation dose(24).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. Bhatia, 2002, Nature Rev, 2, 124
  2. Bhatia, 1996, N Eng J Med, 334, 745, 10.1056/NEJM199603213341201 · DOI
  3. Boice, 1987, J Natl Cancer Inst, 79, 1295
  4. Boice, 1988, Radiat Res, 116, 3, 10.2307/3577477 · DOI
  5. Boice, 1989, Int J Cancer, 44, 7, 10.1002/ijc.2910440103 · DOI
  6. Boice, 1991a, Radiat Res, 125, 214, 10.2307/3577890 · DOI
  7. Boice, 1991b, J Am Med Assoc, 265, 1290, 10.1001/jama.1991.03460100092031 · DOI
  8. Boice, 1992, N Engl J Med, 326, 781, 10.1056/NEJM199203193261201 · DOI
  9. Boice, 1999, Teratology, 59, 227, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199904)59:4<227::AID-TERA7>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
  10. Boivin, 1995, J Natl Cancer Inst, 87, 732, 10.1093/jnci/87.10.732 · DOI
  11. Carr, 2002, Radiat Res, 157, 668, 10.1667/0033-7587(2002)157[0668:MNARTF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  12. Clemons, 2000, Cancer Treat Rev, 26, 291, 10.1053/ctrv.2000.0174 · DOI
  13. Curtis, 1992, N Engl J Med, 326, 1745, 10.1056/NEJM199206253262605 · DOI
  14. Damber, 2001, Acta Oncologica, 41, 25, 10.1080/028418602317314028 · DOI
  15. Davis, 1989, Cancer Res, 49, 6130
  16. DeGroot, 1983, Am J Med, 74, 852, 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91077-X · DOI
  17. Doll, 1997, Br J Radiol, 70, 130, 10.1259/bjr.70.830.9135438 · DOI
  18. Donnelly, 2001, Am J Roentgenol, 176, 303, 10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760303 · DOI
  19. Doody, 2000, Spine, 25, 2052, 10.1097/00007632-200008150-00009 · DOI
  20. Dores, 2002, J Clin Oncol, 20, 3484, 10.1200/JCO.2002.09.038 · DOI
  21. dos Santos Silva, 1999, Radiat Res, 152, S88, 10.2307/3580121 · DOI
  22. Franklyn, 1998, N Engl J Med, 338, 712, 10.1056/NEJM199803123381103 · DOI
  23. Franklyn, 1999, Lancet, 353, 2111, 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)12295-X · DOI
  24. Hahn, 2001, Radiat Res, 156, 61, 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0061:TCADAO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  25. Hall, 1996, Radiat Res, 145, 86, 10.2307/3579200 · DOI
  26. Hallquist, 2001, Eur J Cancer Prev, 10, 147, 10.1097/00008469-200104000-00005 · DOI
  27. Hancock, 1993, J Natl Cancer Inst, 85, 25, 10.1093/jnci/85.1.25 · DOI
  28. Hanford, 1962, J Am Med Assoc, 181, 132
  29. Hawkins, 1996, J Nat Cancer Inst, 88, 270, 10.1093/jnci/88.5.270 · DOI
  30. Holm, 1989, J Natl Cancer Inst, 81, 302, 10.1093/jnci/81.4.302 · DOI
  31. Holm, 1991, J Natl Cancer Inst, 83, 1072, 10.1093/jnci/83.15.1072 · DOI
  32. Howe, 1995, Radiat Res, 142, 295, 10.2307/3579139 · DOI
  33. Howe, 1996, Radiat Res, 145, 694, 10.2307/3579360 · DOI
  34. Infante-Rivard, 2000, Am J Epidemiol, 152, 480, 10.1093/aje/152.5.480 · DOI
  35. Infante-Rivard, 2000, Environ Health Perspect, 108, 495, 10.1289/ehp.00108495 · DOI
  36. Inskip, 1995, J Natl Cancer Inst, 87, 1613, 10.1093/jnci/87.21.1613 · DOI
  37. Jemal, 2002, CA Cancer J Clin, 52, 23, 10.3322/canjclin.52.1.23 · DOI
  38. Kaldor, 1990, N Engl J Med, 322, 7, 10.1056/NEJM199001043220102 · DOI
  39. Knox, 1987, J Soc Radiol Prot, 7, 177, 10.1088/0260-2814/7/4/003 · DOI
  40. Lindberg, 1995, Acta Oncol, 34, 735, 10.3109/02841869509127180 · DOI
  41. Little, 2001, Lancet Oncol, 2, 212, 10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00291-6 · DOI
  42. Little, 2002, Int J Radiat Biol, 78, 145, 10.1080/09553000110095714 · DOI
  43. Little, 1999, Radiat Res, 151, 218, 10.2307/3579773 · DOI
  44. Little, 1998, Int J Cancer, 78, 269, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19981029)78:3<269::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
  45. Lundell, 1994, Radiat Res, 140, 334, 10.2307/3579110 · DOI
  46. Maxon, 1980, J Am Med Assoc, 244, 1802, 10.1001/jama.1980.03310160018016 · DOI
  47. Meinert, 1999, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 8, 793
  48. Mettler, 1993, Radiol, 189, 377, 10.1148/radiology.189.2.8210363 · DOI
  49. Mori, 1999, Radiat Res, 152, S84, 10.2307/3580120 · DOI
  50. Naumburg, 2001, Radiat Res, 156, 718, 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0718:IETDXR]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  51. Nekolla, 1999, Radiat Res, 152, S3, 10.2307/3580102 · DOI
  52. Nekolla, 2000, Radiat Res, 153, 93, 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)153[0093:IOMBTI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  53. Nyberg, 2002, Radiat Res, 157, 419, 10.1667/0033-7587(2002)157[0419:CIASPE]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  54. Pierce, 1996, Radiat Res, 146, 1, 10.2307/3579391 · DOI
  55. Platz, 2000, Int J Radiat Biol, 76, 955, 10.1080/09553000050050963 · DOI
  56. Pottern, 1990, J Clin Epidemiol, 43, 449, 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90133-A · DOI
  57. Preston-Martin, 1985, Am J Epidemiol, 121, 430, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114015 · DOI
  58. Preston-Martin, 1988, J Natl Cancer Inst, 80, 943, 10.1093/jnci/80.12.943 · DOI
  59. Preston-Martin, 1989, Br J Cancer, 59, 639, 10.1038/bjc.1989.130 · DOI
  60. Ron, 1989, Radiat Res, 120, 516, 10.2307/3577801 · DOI
  61. Ron, 1991, Radiat Res, 125, 318, 10.2307/3578117 · DOI
  62. Ron, 1998a, Cancer Causes Control, 9, 393, 10.1023/A:1008867617415 · DOI
  63. Ron, 1998b, JAMA, 280, 347, 10.1001/jama.280.4.347 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Schneider, 1993, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 77, 362
  65. Sherman, 1978, Health Phys, 35, 259, 10.1097/00004032-197808000-00008 · DOI
  66. Shore, 1993, Am J Epidemiol, 137, 1068, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116610 · DOI
  67. Shore, 2002, Radiat Res, 157, 410, 10.1667/0033-7587(2002)157[0410:SCAXRT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  68. Shu, 1994, Br J Cancer, 70, 531, 10.1038/bjc.1994.340 · DOI
  69. Shu, 2002, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 11, 177
  70. Slovis, 2002, Pediat Radiol, 32, 217, 10.1007/s00247-002-0669-8 · DOI
  71. Stewart, 1956, Lancet, 2, 447, 10.1016/S0140-6736(56)91923-7 · DOI
  72. Storm, 1992, J Natl Cancer Inst, 84, 1245, 10.1093/jnci/84.16.1245 · DOI
  73. Thompson, 1994, Radiat Res, 137, S17, 10.2307/3578892 · DOI
  74. Travis, 1995, J Clin Oncol, 13, 533, 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.2.533 · DOI
  75. Travis, 2000, J Natl Cancer Inst, 92, 1165, 10.1093/jnci/92.14.1165 · DOI
  76. Travis, 2001, Radiat Res, 156, 136, 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0136:MACAWO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  77. Travis, 2002, J Natl Cancer Inst, 94, 182, 10.1093/jnci/94.3.182 · DOI
  78. Tucker, 1987, J Natl Cancer Inst, 78, 459, 10.1093/jnci/78.3.459 · DOI
  79. Tucker, 1991, Cancer Res, 51, 2885
  80. van Kaick, 1999, Radiat Res, 152, S64, 10.2307/3580117 · DOI
  81. Wick, 1999, Radiat Res, 152, S8, 10.2307/3580103 · DOI
  82. Wong, 1997, J Am Med Assoc, 278, 1262, 10.1001/jama.1997.03550150066037 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ron, E.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Ron, Elaine
Venue
Health Physics
Published
2003-07
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
47-59
ISSN
0017-9078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973822753
Cited by
382
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
Keywords
cancer risk, medical radiation, ionizing radiation, diagnostic radiology, radiotherapy, childhood cancer survivors, breast cancer, leukemia, liver cancer, radionuclides, occupational radiation exposure, radiation protection, fluoroscopy, dental radiography, scoliosis, tuberculosis, thorium-224
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Radiation Dosage, Radiography, Radiometry, Radionuclide Imaging, Radiotherapy, Radiotherapy Dosage, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Radiopharmaceuticals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review