The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geographic Variation in the Use of Breast-Conserving Treatment for Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In the past decade there has been an increase in the use of treatment designed to conserve the breast for women with breast cancer. The extent to which such treatment has been adopted in various regions of the country and whether characteristics of hospitals and patients predict its use is not known, however. METHODS: We used national data on Medicare claims for inpatient care provided in 1986 to study 36,982 women 65 to 79 years of age, who had local or regional breast cancer and underwent either mastectomy or breast-conserving treatment (local excision, quadrantectomy, or subtotal mastectomy). Information about the hospitals at which these women were treated was obtained from an American Hospital Association survey. RESULTS: Of the 36,982 women, 12.1 percent had breast-conserving surgery and 87.9 percent had a mastectomy. The frequency of breast-conserving surgery ranged from 3.5 percent to 21.2 percent in various states. The highest rate of use was in the Middle Atlantic states (20.0 percent) and New England (17.2 percent), and the lowest was in the East South Central states (5.9 percent) and the West South Central states (7.3 percent). Breast-conserving treatment was used more often in urban than in rural areas, in teaching hospitals than in nonteaching hospitals, in large hospitals than in small hospitals, and in hospitals with on-site radiation therapy or geriatric services than in others. Most of the geographic variation persisted after adjustment for the characteristics of hospitals and patients for which data were available. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving surgery, which cannot be explained by differences in hospital characteristics. Hospital characteristics that were independently redictive of greater use of breast-conserving surgery were the size of the metropolitan area, the status of the institution as a teaching hospital, and the availability of radiation therapy and geriatric services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Cited by
Influence of Hospital Procedure Volume on Outcomes Following Surgery for Colon Cancer
Schrag, D. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.23.3028 · Cited by 490
Bodai, B. I., & Tuso, P. (2015) · The Permanente Journal · doi:10.7812/tpp/14-241 · Cited by 397
Chronic pain and other sequelae in long-term breast cancer survivors: nationwide survey in Denmark.
Peuckmann, V., Ekholm, O., Rasmussen, N. K., Groenvold, M., Christiansen, P., Møller, S., Eriksen, J., & Sjøgren, P. (2009) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.05.015 · Cited by 264
Modeling Medical Treatment Using Markov Decision Processes
Schaefer, A. J., Bailey, M. D., Shechter, S. M., & Roberts, M. S. (2005) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/1-4020-8066-2_23 · Cited by 155
Racial Differences and Disparities in Cancer Care and Outcomes
Esnaola, N. F., & Ford, M. E. (2012) · Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.soc.2012.03.012 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Nattinger, A. B., Gottlieb, M. S., Veum, J., Yahnke, D., & Goodwin, J. S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1992-04-23
- Volume
- 326
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1102-1107
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2338895639
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geographic Variation in the Use of Breast-Conserving Treatment for Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199204233261702
- The paper
- Nattinger, A. B., Gottlieb, M. S., Veum, J., Yahnke, D., & Goodwin, J. S. (1992). Geographic Variation in the Use of Breast-Conserving Treatment for Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199204233261702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.