Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Controlled Trial of Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole or Aerosolized Pentamidine for Secondary Prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia in Patients with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 021

Open access
Hardy, W. David, Feinberg, Judith, Finkelstein, Dianne M., Power, Maureen E., He, Weili, Kaczka, Carolyn, Frame, Peter T., Holmes, Martin, Waskin, Hetty, Fass, Robert J., Powderly, William G., Steigbigel, Roy T., Zuger, Abigail, Holzman, Robert S.·1992·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) continues to be the most common index diagnosis in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), but it is not clear which of several available agents is the most effective in preventing a recurrence of PCP. METHODS: We conducted a comparative, open-label trial in 310 adults with AIDS who had recently recovered from an initial episode of PCP and had no treatment-limiting toxic effects of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or pentamidine. All the patients were treated with zidovudine and were randomly assigned to receive either 800 mg of sulfamethoxazole and 160 mg of trimethoprim once daily or 300 mg of aerosolized pentamidine administered every four weeks by jet nebulizer. The participants were followed for a median of 17.4 months. RESULTS: In the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group (n = 154) there were 14 recurrences of PCP, as compared with 36 recurrences (including 1 extrapulmonary recurrence) in the aerosolized-pentamidine group (n = 156). The estimated recurrence rates at 18 months were 11.4 percent with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and 27.6 percent with pentamidine (P < 0.001). The risk of a recurrence (adjusted for initial CD4 cell count) was 3.25 times higher in the pentamidine group (P < 0.001, 95 percent confidence interval, 1.72 to 6.16). There were no significant differences between the groups in survival or in hematologic or hepatic toxicity. Crossovers from trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole to aerosolized pentamidine were more common than the reverse (27 vs. 4 percent), partly because of the study protocols for the management of leukopenia. There were 19 serious bacterial infections in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group and 38 in the pentamidine group. The time to a first bacterial infection was significantly greater for those assigned to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AIDS who are receiving zidovudine, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is more effective than aerosolized pentamidine in conventional doses for the prevention of recurrent pneumocystis infection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199212243272604

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
Hardy, W. D., Feinberg, J., Finkelstein, D. M., Power, M. E., He, W., Kaczka, C., Frame, P. T., Holmes, M., Waskin, H., Fass, R. J., Powderly, W. G., Steigbigel, R. T., Zuger, A., & Holzman, R. S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1992-12-24
Volume
327
Issue
26
Pages
1842-1848
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2326288814
Cited by
346
References
0
FWCI
27.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Controlled Trial of Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole or Aerosolized Pentamidine for Secondary Prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia in Patients with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 021. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199212243272604
The paper
Hardy, W. D., Feinberg, J., Finkelstein, D. M., Power, M. E., He, W., Kaczka, C., Frame, P. T., Holmes, M., Waskin, H., Fass, R. J., Powderly, W. G., Steigbigel, R. T., Zuger, A., & Holzman, R. S. (1992). A Controlled Trial of Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole or Aerosolized Pentamidine for Secondary Prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia in Patients with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 021. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199212243272604

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.