The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Immediate Angioplasty Compared with the Administration of a Thrombolytic Agent Followed by Conservative Treatment for Myocardial Infarction
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Immediate angioplasty and the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment are two approaches to the management of acute myocardial infarction, but these methods have not been compared prospectively. METHODS: We enrolled 108 patients with acute myocardial infarction in a randomized trial designed to test the hypothesis that immediate angioplasty (without previous thrombolytic therapy) may result in greater myocardial salvage than the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment. The primary end point was the change in the size of the perfusion defect as assessed at admission and discharge by tomographic imaging with technetium-99m sestamibi, a myocardial perfusion agent that can measure myocardium at risk and final infarct size. RESULTS: End-point data were available for 56 patients randomly assigned to receive tissue plasminogen activator (mean [+/- SD] time to start of infusion, 232 +/- 174 minutes after the onset of chest pain) and 47 patients randomly assigned to receive angioplasty (first balloon inflation at 277 +/- 144 minutes). In the case of anterior infarction, myocardial salvage as assessed by imaging with technetium-99m sestamibi was 27 +/- 21 percent of the left ventricle for 22 patients in the thrombolysis group, as compared with 31 +/- 21 percent for 15 patients in the angioplasty group. For infarcts in all other locations, myocardial salvage was 7 +/- 13 percent for 34 patients in the thrombolysis group and 5 +/- 10 percent for 32 patients in the angioplasty group. After adjustment for infarct location, the difference in mean salvage between groups was 0 (P = 0.98), with a 95 percent confidence interval of +/- 6 percent of the left ventricle. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction, immediate angioplasty does not appear to result in greater myocardial salvage than the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment, although a small difference between these two therapeutic approaches cannot be excluded.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons
Lumley, T. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1201 · Cited by 1,206
Scanlon, P. J., Faxon, D. P., Audet, A.-M., Carabello, B., Dehmer, G. J., Eagle, K. A., Legako, R. D., Leon, D. F., Murray, J. A., Nissen, S. E., et al. (1999) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00126-6 · Cited by 1,123
Self-citationAntman, E. M., Anbe, D. T., Armstrong, P. W., Bates, E. R., Green, L. A., Hand, M., Hochman, J. S., Krumholz, H. M., Kushner, F. G., Lamas, G. A., et al. (2004) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.002 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationMcClellan, M. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520110039026 · Cited by 773
Brener, S. J., Barr, L. A., Burchenal, J. E. B., Katz, S., George, B. S., Jones, A. A., Cohen, E. D., Gainey, P. C., White, H. J., Cheek, H. B., et al. (1998) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.98.8.734 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibbons, R. J., Holmes, D. R., Reeder, G. S., Bailey, K. R., Hopfenspirger, M. R., & Gersh, B. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1993-03-11
- Volume
- 328
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 685-691
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2337272710
- Cited by
- 815
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 60.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immediate Angioplasty Compared with the Administration of a Thrombolytic Agent Followed by Conservative Treatment for Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199303113281003
- The paper
- Gibbons, R. J., Holmes, D. R., Reeder, G. S., Bailey, K. R., Hopfenspirger, M. R., & Gersh, B. J. (1993). Immediate Angioplasty Compared with the Administration of a Thrombolytic Agent Followed by Conservative Treatment for Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199303113281003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.