Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 906

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of Hormone-Replacement Therapy with Various Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Postmenopausal Women

Nabulsi, Azmi A., Folsom, Aaron R., White, Alice, Patsch, Wolfgang, Heiss, Gerardo, Wu, Kenneth K., Szklo, Moyses·1993·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most epidemiologic studies of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women suggest that estrogen-replacement therapy has a protective effect. The effects of the use of estrogen combined with progestin are less well studied. METHODS: To examine the associations of hormone-replacement therapy with concentrations of plasma lipids and hemostatic factors, fasting serum concentrations of glucose and insulin, and blood pressure, we studied 4958 postmenopausal women participating in a population-based investigation. Using cross-sectional data, we classified the women into four groups according to their use of hormone-replacement therapy: current users of estrogen alone, current users of estrogen with progestin, nonusers who had formerly used these hormones, nonusers who had never used them. RESULTS: Current users had higher mean levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, its subfractions high-density lipoprotein2 and high-density lipoprotein3, and apolipoprotein A-I than nonusers and lower mean levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein(a), fibrinogen, antithrombin III, and fasting serum glucose and insulin. However, current users of estrogen alone had higher triglyceride, factor VII, and protein C levels than either nonusers or current users of estrogen with progestin. After making certain assumptions, we estimated that the findings, if causal, would translate into a reduction of 42 percent in the risk of coronary heart disease in users of hormones as compared with nonusers. Women using estrogen with progestin would have an even greater estimated benefit. CONCLUSIONS: A randomized trial is needed to eliminate possible selection biases in our observational study that are related to the prescription of replacement hormones. Nevertheless, hormone-replacement therapy appears to be associated with a favorable physiologic profile, which probably mediates its protective effects on cardiovascular disease. The use of estrogen combined with progestin appears to be associated with a better profile than the use of estrogen alone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199304153281501

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 906

Metadata

Authors
Nabulsi, A. A., Folsom, A. R., White, A., Patsch, W., Heiss, G., Wu, K. K., & Szklo, M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1993-04-15
Volume
328
Issue
15
Pages
1069-1075
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2316008127
Cited by
906
References
2
FWCI
62.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of Hormone-Replacement Therapy with Various Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Postmenopausal Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199304153281501
The paper
Nabulsi, A. A., Folsom, A. R., White, A., Patsch, W., Heiss, G., Wu, K. K., & Szklo, M. (1993). Association of Hormone-Replacement Therapy with Various Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Postmenopausal Women. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199304153281501

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.