Cited by 599Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsEstrogen and related hormone effectsHormonal and reproductive studies

Effect of oestrogen plus progestin on the incidence of diabetes in postmenopausal women: results from the Women’s Health Initiative Hormone Trial

Open access
for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators, Margolis, K. L., Bonds, D. E., Rodabough, R. J., Tinker, L., Phillips, L. S., Allen, C., Bassford, T. +3 more·2004·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis Studies examining the effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on concentrations of glucose, insulin and diabetes incidence have been inconclusive, in part because many of the studies were too small. We examined the effect of oestrogen plus progestin on diabetes incidence and insulin resistance.Methods The study was a randomised, double-blind trial comparing the effect of daily 0.625 mg conjugated equine oestrogens plus 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate with that of placebo during 5.6 years of follow-up. The participants were 15,641 postmenopausal women enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trial. These women were aged 50 to 79 and all had an intact uterus. Diabetes incidence was ascertained by self-report of treatment with insulin or oral hypoglycaemic medication. Fasting glucose, insulin, and lipoproteins were measured in a random sample at baseline and at 1 and 3 years.Results The cumulative incidence of treated diabetes was 3.5% in the hormone therapy group and 4.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.93, p=0.004). There was little change in the hazard ratio after adjustment for changes in BMI and waist circumference. During the first year of follow-up, changes in fasting glucose and insulin indicated a significant fall in insulin resistance in actively treated women compared to the control subjects (Year 1 to baseline between-group difference -0.22+/-0.10, p=0.03). INTERPRETATIONS/CONCLUSION: These data suggest that combined therapy with oestrogen and progestin reduces the incidence of diabetes, possibly mediated by a decrease in insulin resistance unrelated to body size. Future studies of alternative postmenopausal hormone therapy regimens and selective oestrogen agonists and/or antagonists should consider the effects of these regimens on insulin resistance and diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-004-1448-x

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Post-menopausal women are at increased risk of developing diabetes, an effect that can be mitigated by estrogen replacement therapy, suggesting an important role for estrogens in diabetes risk.

    “Post-menopausal women are also at increased risk of developing diabetes, an effect that can be mitigated by estrogen replacement therapy (74), suggesting an important role for estrogens in diabetes risk ( Table 1 ).”

    From Metabolic impact of endogenously produced estrogens by adipose tissue in females and males across the lifespan (2025) · cites this paper as [74]

    The Results (page not available) report lower treated-diabetes incidence with oestrogen plus progestin than with placebo in postmenopausal women. The trial did not compare pre- and postmenopausal women, so it does not establish that menopause increases diabetes risk; it also tested combined therapy, not oestrogen alone. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The majority of menopausal hormone therapy trials have been done in women of normal weight (BMI<30); as such, the reported impact of MHT on body weight and adiposity has been modest.

    “The majority of MHT trials have been done in women of normal weight (BMI<30); as such, the reported impact of MHT on body weight and adiposity has been modest (74, 204–206).”

    From Metabolic impact of endogenously produced estrogens by adipose tissue in females and males across the lifespan (2025) · cites this paper as [74]

    The Results report a small reduction in BMI and waist circumference with oestrogen plus progestin, supporting the claim that the observed effects were modest. They give a mean baseline BMI of 28 for this trial, but the paper does not establish that most MHT trials enrolled women with BMI below 30 or that this explains the modest effects. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators, Margolis, K. L., Bonds, D. E., Rodabough, R. J., Tinker, L., Phillips, L. S., Allen, C., Bassford, T., Burke, G., Torrens, J., & Howard, B. V.
Affiliations
  • Hennepin County Medical Center (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Howard University (US)
Corresponding author
Margolis, K. L.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2004-07
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
1175-1187
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2064176291
Cited by
599
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 30
FWCI
16.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health (5k23hl003996-05, HS-07922)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS 07922)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23 HL03996)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD001457, HD-01457)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
hormone replacement therapy, diabetes incidence, insulin resistance, conjugated equine estrogens, medroxyprogesterone acetate, fasting blood glucose, insulin
MeSH terms
Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Energy Intake, Diabetes Mellitus, Double-Blind Method, Estrogens, Conjugated (USP), Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Middle Aged, Smoking, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, Patient Selection, Body Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review