Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 559

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evidence of Impaired Endothelium-Dependent Coronary Vasodilatation in Patients with Angina Pectoris and Normal Coronary Angiograms

Egashira, Kensuke, Inou, Tetsuzi, Hirooka, Yoshitaka, Yamada, Akira, Urabe, Yoshitoshi, Takeshita, Akira·1993·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A group of patients has been described who have chest pain resembling angina and positive exercise tests, but normal coronary angiograms and no coronary-artery spasm. This constellation of features has sometimes been called syndrome X or microvascular angina. We attempted to determine whether endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of the coronary vasculature was impaired in patients with this syndrome. METHODS: We infused the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine and the endothelium-independent vasodilators papaverine and isosorbide dinitrate into the left coronary artery of 9 patients and 10 control subjects. The diameter of the left anterior descending coronary artery was assessed by quantitative angiography, and changes in coronary blood flow were estimated with the use of an intracoronary Doppler catheter. RESULTS: Acetylcholine, given in doses of 1, 3, 10, and 30 micrograms per minute, increased coronary blood flow in a dose-dependent manner in both groups. However, the mean (+/- SD) acetylcholine-induced increases in coronary blood flow were significantly less (P < 0.001) in the patient (8 +/- 14, 37 +/- 37, 59 +/- 67, and 103 +/- 77 percent, respectively) than in the controls (62 +/- 52, 186 +/- 93, 341 +/- 128, and 345 +/- 78 percent, respectively). The changes in coronary blood flow in response to 2 mg of isosorbide dinitrate (236 +/- 66 percent vs. 280 +/- 56 percent) and 10 mg of papaverine (366 +/- 168 percent vs. 411 +/- 92 percent) did not differ significantly between the patients and controls. The administration of papaverine resulted in myocardial lactate production in the patients but not in the controls. The three lower doses of acetylcholine caused a similar degree of dilatation of the left anterior descending coronary artery in the two groups, and the highest dose caused a similar degree of constriction in the two groups. Isosorbide dinitrate and papaverine caused a similar degree of dilatation in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that endothelium-dependent dilatation of the resistance coronary arteries is defective in patients with anginal chest pain and normal coronary arteries, which may contribute to the altered regulation of myocardial perfusion in these patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199306103282302

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 559

Metadata

Authors
Egashira, K., Inou, T., Hirooka, Y., Yamada, A., Urabe, Y., & Takeshita, A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1993-06-10
Volume
328
Issue
23
Pages
1659-1664
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2044928209
Cited by
559
References
0
FWCI
17.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence of Impaired Endothelium-Dependent Coronary Vasodilatation in Patients with Angina Pectoris and Normal Coronary Angiograms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199306103282302
The paper
Egashira, K., Inou, T., Hirooka, Y., Yamada, A., Urabe, Y., & Takeshita, A. (1993). Evidence of Impaired Endothelium-Dependent Coronary Vasodilatation in Patients with Angina Pectoris and Normal Coronary Angiograms. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199306103282302

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.