Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,143

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electrical Alternans and Vulnerability to Ventricular Arrhythmias

Rosenbaum, David S., Jackson, Lance E., Smith, Joseph M., Garan, Hasan, Ruskin, Jeremy N., Cohen, Richard J.·1994·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although electrical alternans (alternating amplitude from beat to beat on the electrocardiogram) has been associated with ventricular arrhythmias in many clinical settings, its physiologic importance and prognostic implications remain unknown. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that electrical alternans is a marker of vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias, we developed a technique to detect subtle alternation in the morphologic features of the electrocardiogram (which would not be detectable by visual inspection of the electrocardiogram). In a group of 83 patients referred for diagnostic electrophysiologic testing, we prospectively examined whether levels of alternans predicted vulnerability to arrhythmias as defined by the outcome of electrophysiologic testing and arrhythmia-free survival. RESULTS: Sustained ventricular arrhythmias were induced during electrophysiologic testing in 32 of the patients (39 percent). In this group, low-level electrical alternans (a beat-to-beat change in amplitude of < 15 microV) was detected over a broad range of physiologic heart rates (from 95 to 150 beats per minute) and primarily involved the ST segment and the T wave (i.e., the phase of repolarization). Alternans during repolarization was a significant and independent predictor of inducible arrhythmias on electrophysiologic testing (sensitivity, 81 percent; specificity, 84 percent; relative risk, 5.2). Of 66 patients followed for up to 20 months, 13 had arrhythmic events. Alternans affecting the T wave and inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias were significant and essentially equivalent predictors of survival without arrhythmia (P < 0.001). Actuarial survival without arrhythmia at 20 months was significantly lower among the patients with T-wave alternans (19 percent) than among the patients without T-wave alternans (94 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Electrical alternans affecting the ST segment and T wave is common among patients at increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias. Subtle electrical alternans on the electrocardiogram may serve as a noninvasive marker of vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199401273300402

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,143

Metadata

Authors
Rosenbaum, D. S., Jackson, L. E., Smith, J. M., Garan, H., Ruskin, J. N., & Cohen, R. J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1994-01-27
Volume
330
Issue
4
Pages
235-241
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2334859129
Cited by
1,143
References
0
FWCI
18.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrical Alternans and Vulnerability to Ventricular Arrhythmias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199401273300402
The paper
Rosenbaum, D. S., Jackson, L. E., Smith, J. M., Garan, H., Ruskin, J. N., & Cohen, R. J. (1994). Electrical Alternans and Vulnerability to Ventricular Arrhythmias. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199401273300402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.