Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Tachyarrhythmias in Children and Adolescents

Open access
Kugler, John D., Danford, David A., Deal, Barbara J., Gillette, Paul C., Perry, James C., Silka, Michael J., Van Hare, George F., Walsh, Edward P.·1994·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although radiofrequency catheter ablation has been used extensively to treat refractory supraventricular tachycardia in adults, few data are available on its safety and efficacy in children and adolescents. We reviewed registry data obtained from 24 centers to evaluate the indications, early results, complications, and short-term follow-up data in young patients who underwent this procedure. METHODS: Standardized data were submitted for 652 patients who underwent 725 procedures between January 1, 1991, and September 1, 1992. The mean length of follow-up was 13.5 months. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 13.5 years, and 84 percent of them had structurally normal hearts. The initial success rates for ablation of atrioventricular accessory pathways (508 of 615 procedures) and atrioventricular-node reentry (63 of 76 procedures) were both 83 percent. Greater institutional experience in performing ablation in children and location of the accessory pathway in the left free wall correlated with greater likelihood of sustained success. Conversely, a right free-wall pathway, the presence of other heart disease, and higher body weight were all associated with a lesser chance of sustained success. Recurrences of arrhythmia accounted for 45 percent of the failures overall in the series. Atrial ectopic-focus tachycardia had the highest recurrence rate. The total complication rate was 4.8 percent (35 of 725 procedures), and the only variables that independently correlated with a higher complication rate were very low weight and less institutional experience. CONCLUSIONS: These early results suggest that radio-frequency catheter ablation has a good success rate and a low complication rate in pediatric patients, especially when it is carried out in experienced pediatric cardiology centers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199405263302103

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Kugler, J. D., Danford, D. A., Deal, B. J., Gillette, P. C., Perry, J. C., Silka, M. J., Van Hare, G. F., & Walsh, E. P.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1994-05-26
Volume
330
Issue
21
Pages
1481-1487
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2339397240
Cited by
384
References
1
FWCI
14.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.