Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Surfactant Therapy and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Verder, Henrik, Robertson, Bengt, Greisen, Gorm, Ebbesen, Finn, Albertsen, Per, Lundstrom, Kaare, Jacobsen, Thorkild·1994·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In southern Scandinavia most babies with respiratory distress syndrome are initially treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. We performed a multicenter trial to investigate whether the addition of a single dose of porcine surfactant administered during a short intubation before the occurrence of serious deterioration could reduce the subsequent need for mechanical ventilation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 35 infants with moderate-to-severe respiratory distress syndrome to surfactant therapy (Curosurf, 200 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus nasal continuous positive airway pressure and 33 infants to nasal continuous positive airway pressure alone. The study was not blinded. The indications for mechanical ventilation were a ratio of arterial to alveolar oxygen tension of less than 0.15, severe apneic attacks, or both. RESULTS: Six hours after randomization, when the median age of the babies was 18 hours, the mean ratio of arterial to alveolar oxygen tension was 0.37 in the surfactant-treated babies, as compared with 0.25 in the controls (P < 0.001). The need for subsequent mechanical ventilation was reduced with surfactant therapy (to 43 percent of the surfactant-treated babies as compared with 85 percent of the controls; P = 0.003). When 17 infants with ratios of arterial-to-alveolar oxygen tension of less than 0.15 at randomization were excluded, the need for mechanical ventilation was still significantly reduced in the surfactant-treated group (to 33 percent [9 of 27 babies], as compared with 83 percent [20 of 24 babies] in the control group; (P < 0.001). After 28 days, two of the surfactant-treated babies had died, as compared with five of the control babies. CONCLUSIONS: In babies with moderate-to-severe respiratory distress syndrome treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure, a single dose of surfactant reduced the need for subsequent mechanical ventilation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199410203311603

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 448

Metadata

Authors
Verder, H., Robertson, B., Greisen, G., Ebbesen, F., Albertsen, P., Lundstrom, K., & Jacobsen, T.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1994-10-20
Volume
331
Issue
16
Pages
1051-1055
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2058682963
Cited by
448
References
9
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surfactant Therapy and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199410203311603
The paper
Verder, H., Robertson, B., Greisen, G., Ebbesen, F., Albertsen, P., Lundstrom, K., & Jacobsen, T. (1994). Surfactant Therapy and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199410203311603

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.