Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 849

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autologous or Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation Compared with Intensive Chemotherapy in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Open access
Zittoun, Robert A., Mandelli, Franco, Willemze, Roel, de Witte, Theo, Labar, Boris, Resegotti, Luigi, Leoni, Franco, Damasio, Eugenio, Visani, Giuseppe, Papa, Giuseppe, Caronia, Francesco, Hayat, Marcel, Stryckmans, Pierre, Rotoli, Bruno, Leoni, Pietro, Peetermans, Marc E., Dardenne, Murielle, Vegna, Maria Luce, Petti, Maria Concetta, Solbu, Gabriel, Suciu, Stefan·1995·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation and intensive consolidation chemotherapy are used to treat acute myelogenous leukemia in a first complete remission. METHODS: After induction treatment with daunorubicin and cytarabine, patients who had a complete remission received a first course of intensive consolidation chemotherapy, combining intermediate-dose cytarabine and amsacrine. Patients with an HLA-identical sibling were assigned to undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplantation; the others were randomly assigned to undergo autologous bone marrow transplantation (with unpurged bone marrow) or a second course of intensive chemotherapy, combining high-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin. Comparisons were made on the basis of the intention to treat. RESULTS: A total of 623 patients had a complete remission; 168 were assigned to undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, and 254 were randomly assigned to one of the other two groups. Of these patients, 343 completed the treatment assignment: 144 in the allogeneic-transplantation group, 95 in the autologous-transplantation group, and 104 in the intensive-chemotherapy group. The relapse rate was highest in the intensive-chemotherapy group and lowest in the allogeneic-transplantation group, whereas the mortality rate was highest after allogeneic transplantation and lowest after intensive chemotherapy. The projected rate of disease-free survival at four years was 55 percent for allogeneic transplantation, 48 percent for autologous transplantation, and 30 percent for intensive chemotherapy. However, the overall survival after complete remission was similar in the three groups, since more patients who relapsed after a second course of intensive chemotherapy had a response to subsequent autologous bone marrow transplantation. Other differences were also observed, especially with regard to hematopoietic recovery (it occurred later after autologous transplantation) and the duration of hospitalization (it was longer with bone marrow transplantation). CONCLUSIONS: Autologous as well as allogeneic bone marrow transplantation results in better disease-free survival than intensive consolidation chemotherapy with high-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin. Transplantation soon after a relapse or during a second complete remission might also be appropriate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199501263320403

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 849

Metadata

Authors
Zittoun, R. A., Mandelli, F., Willemze, R., de Witte, T., Labar, B., Resegotti, L., Leoni, F., Damasio, E., Visani, G., Papa, G., Caronia, F., Hayat, M., Stryckmans, P., Rotoli, B., Leoni, P., Peetermans, M. E., Dardenne, M., Vegna, M. L., Petti, M. C., Solbu, G., & Suciu, S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1995-01-26
Volume
332
Issue
4
Pages
217-223
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2013051826
Cited by
849
References
1
FWCI
27.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autologous or Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation Compared with Intensive Chemotherapy in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199501263320403
The paper
Zittoun, R. A., Mandelli, F., Willemze, R., de Witte, T., Labar, B., Resegotti, L., Leoni, F., Damasio, E., Visani, G., Papa, G., Caronia, F., Hayat, M., Stryckmans, P., Rotoli, B., Leoni, P., Peetermans, M. E., Dardenne, M., Vegna, M. L., Petti, M. C., . . . Suciu, S. (1995). Autologous or Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation Compared with Intensive Chemotherapy in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199501263320403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.