The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decline in Semen Quality among Fertile Men in Paris during the Past 20 Years
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested a population-wide decline in the quality of semen over the past 50 years, but clear evidence for decreasing semen quality in recent decades is lacking. METHODS: From 1973 through 1992 we measured the volume of seminal fluid, the sperm concentration, and the percentages of motile and morphologically normal spermatozoa in 1351 healthy fertile men. The data on the semen samples were collected at one sperm bank in Paris. The data in each calendar year were analyzed as a function of the year of donation, the age of each patient, the year of birth, and the duration of sexual abstinence before semen collection. RESULTS: There was no change in semen volume during the study period. The mean concentration of sperm decreased by 2.1 percent per year, from 89 x 10(6) per milliliter in 1973 to 60 x 10(6) per milliliter in 1992 (P < 0.001). During the same period the percentages of motile and normal spermatozoa decreased by 0.6 percent and 0.5 percent per year, respectively (both P < 0.001). After adjustment in multiple regression analyses for age and the duration of sexual abstinence, each successive calendar year of birth accounted for 2.6 percent of the yearly decline in the sperm concentration and for 0.3 percent and 0.7 percent, respectively, of the yearly declines in the percentages of motile and normal spermatozoa (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During the past 20 years, there has been a decline in the concentration and motility of sperm and in the percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa in fertile men that is independent of the age of the men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement
Diamanti-Kandarakis, E., Bourguignon, J.-P., Giudice, L. C., Hauser, R., Prins, G. S., Soto, A. M., Zoeller, R. T., & Gore, A. C. (2009) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2009-0002 · Cited by 4,585
World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics*‡
Cooper, T. G., Noonan, E., von Eckardstein, S., Auger, J., Baker, H. W. G., Behre, H. M., Haugen, T. B., Kruger, T., Wang, C., Mbizvo, M. T., et al. (2010) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp048 · Cited by 2,827
Self-citationTemporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis
Levine, H., Jørgensen, N., Martino-Andrade, A., Mendiola, J., Weksler-Derri, D., Mindlis, I., Pinotti, R., & Swan, S. H. (2017) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmx022 · Cited by 1,374
Trends of male factor infertility, an important cause of infertility: A review of literature
Kumar, N., & Singh, A. K. (2015) · Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.4103/0974-1208.170370 · Cited by 1,122
Some Alkyl Hydroxy Benzoate Preservatives (Parabens) Are Estrogenic
Routledge, E. J., Parker, J., Odum, J., Ashby, J., & Sumpter, J. P. (1998) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1006/taap.1998.8544 · Cited by 721
Metadata
- Authors
- Auger, J., Kunstmann, J. M., Czyglik, F., & Jouannet, P.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1995-02-02
- Volume
- 332
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 281-285
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2326400925
- Cited by
- 1,132
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 57.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decline in Semen Quality among Fertile Men in Paris during the Past 20 Years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199502023320501
- The paper
- Auger, J., Kunstmann, J. M., Czyglik, F., & Jouannet, P. (1995). Decline in Semen Quality among Fertile Men in Paris during the Past 20 Years. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199502023320501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.