The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effect of Debulking Surgery after Induction Chemotherapy on the Prognosis in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Although the value of primary cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer is beyond doubt, the value of debulking surgery after induction chemotherapy has not yet been defined. In this randomized study we investigated the effect on survival of debulking surgery. METHODS: Eligible patients had residual lesions measuring more than 1 cm in diameter after primary surgery. After three cycles of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin, these patients were randomly assigned to undergo either debulking surgery or no surgery, followed by further cycles of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin. The study end points were progression-free and overall survival. At surgery 65 percent of the patients had lesions measuring more than 1 cm. In 45 percent of this group, the lesions were reduced surgically to less than 1 cm. RESULTS: Of the 319 patients who underwent randomization, 278 could be evaluated (140 patients who underwent surgery and 138 patients who did not). Progression-free and overall survival were both significantly longer in the group that underwent surgery (P = 0.01). The difference in median survival was six months. The survival rate at two years was 56 percent for the group that underwent surgery and 46 percent for the group that did not. In the multivariate analysis, debulking surgery was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.012). Overall, after adjustment for all other prognostic factors, surgery reduced the risk of death by 33 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 10 to 50 percent; P = 0.008). Surgery was not associated with death or severe morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Debulking surgery significantly lengthened progression-free and overall survival. The risk of death was reduced by one third, after adjustment for a variety of prognostic factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Cited by
du Bois, A., Reuss, A., Pujade‐Lauraine, E., Harter, P., Ray‐Coquard, I., & Pfisterer, J. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24149 · Cited by 1,638
Eisenhauer, E. A., Vermorken, J. B., & van Glabbeke, M. (1997) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1023/a:1008240421028 · Cited by 265
PET and [18F]-FDG in oncology: A clinical update
Conti, P. S., Lilien, D. L., Hawley, K., Keppler, J., Grafton, S. T., & Bading, J. R. (1996) · Nuclear Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/0969-8051(96)00074-1 · Cited by 259
Port-site metastases after open laparoscopy: A study in 173 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma
Vergote, I., Marquette, S., Amant, F., Berteloot, P., & Neven, P. (2005) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.00135.x · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Burg, M. E. L., van Lent, M., Buyse, M., Kobierska, A., Colombo, N., Favalli, G., Lacave, A. J., Nardi, M., Renard, J., & Pecorelli, S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1995-03-09
- Volume
- 332
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 629-634
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2316952834
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Debulking Surgery after Induction Chemotherapy on the Prognosis in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199503093321002
- The paper
- van der Burg, M. E. L., van Lent, M., Buyse, M., Kobierska, A., Colombo, N., Favalli, G., Lacave, A. J., Nardi, M., Renard, J., & Pecorelli, S. (1995). The Effect of Debulking Surgery after Induction Chemotherapy on the Prognosis in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199503093321002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.