Cited by 133Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Port-site metastases after open laparoscopy: A study in 173 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma

Open access
Vergote, I., Marquette, S., Amant, F., Berteloot, P., Neven, P.·2005·International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Abstract

Open laparoscopy was used to diagnose advanced ovarian cancer. Patients with a pelvic mass and an omental cake and/or large-volume ascites were selected for open laparoscopy. One hundred and seventy-three patients with stage III or IV ovarian carcinoma underwent diagnostic open laparoscopy. Seventy-one patients underwent complete excision of port sites at the time of debulking surgery. Thirty (17%) patients developed port-site metastases. However, only 8 (5%) of these port-site metastases were clinically diagnosed, while 22 out of 71 (31%) with complete port-site excision were diagnosed on pathologic examination. There was no significant relationship between the development of port-site metastases and median time to primary chemotherapy or surgery, the presence of ascites, or stage IV disease. All port-site metastases disappeared during primary therapy, and none of the patients developed a second relapse in one of their port sites. We observed a high rate of port-site metastases after laparoscopy in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. However, prognosis was not worse in this group of patients. Laparoscopy is a convenient technique to diagnose advanced ovarian carcinoma, to exclude other primary tumors, and to refer patients to a tertiary center.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200509000-00010

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vergote, I., Marquette, S., Amant, F., Berteloot, P., & Neven, P.
Affiliations
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
Venue
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
776-779
ISSN
1048-891X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016676868
Cited by
133
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecological Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Keywords
port-site metastases, advanced ovarian cancer, cytoreductive surgery, ascites, omental cake, stage III and IV ovarian cancer, prognosis
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Staging, Ovarian Neoplasms, Laparoscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review