CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4History of Science and MedicineHistorical Medical Research and TreatmentsMedical History and Innovations

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Book Review The Private Science of Louis Pasteur By Gerald L. Geison. 378 pp., illustrated. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 1995. $29.95. 0-691-03442-7

Fee, Elizabeth·1995·New England Journal of Medicine
DOI 10.1056/nejm199509283331321
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199509283331321

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Fee, E.
Corresponding author
Fee, Elizabeth
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society
Published
1995-09-28
Volume
333
Issue
13
Pages
884-885
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
DOI
10.1056/nejm199509283331321
OpenAlex
W2030767334
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
Keywords
Louis Pasteur, history of microbiology, history of bacteriology, germ theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review