Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Evaluation of Chest Pain in Women

Douglas, Pamela S., Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.·1996·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The evaluation of chest pain is a critical step in the care of women with heart disease. It is a point at which women are likely to be treated differently from men,16 especially when the diagnosis has not been established. Among patients known to have coronary artery disease, differences in the care given the two sexes are much less sharp. Physicians may be puzzled about how to incorporate into clinical care new data on different patterns of treatment for men and women.In the study of coronary heart disease, women have often been excluded from clinical trials or studied . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199605163342007

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Douglas, P. S., & Ginsburg, G. S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1996-05-16
Volume
334
Issue
20
Pages
1311-1315
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2313596761
Cited by
369
References
43
FWCI
18.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evaluation of Chest Pain in Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199605163342007
The paper
Douglas, P. S., & Ginsburg, G. S. (1996). The Evaluation of Chest Pain in Women. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199605163342007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.