Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Theophylline in Asthma

Weinberger, Miles, Hendeles, Leslie·1996·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Theophylline has been a popular medication for asthma for over 50 years. However, the introduction of newer pharmacologic agents, concern about the toxicity of theophylline, and recommendations in widely disseminated guidelines have recently contributed to its decreased use. In this review we reassess the role of theophylline in the pharmacotherapy of asthma and specifically address three pivotal questions: What are the data justifying its continued use? What are its risks? What is its role in the treatment of patients with asthma?HistoryAlthough first used as intravenous therapy for acute asthma1 and then as an oral medication in fixed doses . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199605233342107

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Weinberger, M., & Hendeles, L.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1996-05-23
Volume
334
Issue
21
Pages
1380-1388
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2022935295
Cited by
274
References
54
FWCI
11.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theophylline in Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199605233342107
The paper
Weinberger, M., & Hendeles, L. (1996). Theophylline in Asthma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199605233342107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.