The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Television — Miracles and Misinformation
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Responsible, shared decision making on the part of physicians and patients about the potential use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) requires patients who are educated about the procedure's risks and benefits. Television is an important source of information about CPR for patients. We analyzed how three popular television programs depict CPR. METHODS: We watched all the episodes of the television programs ER and Chicago Hope during the 1994-1995 viewing season and 50 consecutive episodes of Rescue 911 broadcast over a three-month period in 1995. We identified all occurrences of CPR in each episode and recorded the causes of cardiac arrest, the identifiable demographic characteristics of the patients, the underlying illnesses, and the outcomes. RESULTS: There were 60 occurrences of CPR in the 97 television episodes--31 on ER, 11 on Chicago Hope, and 18 on Rescue 911. In the majority of cases, cardiac arrest was caused by trauma; only 28 percent were due to primary cardiac causes. Sixty-five percent of the cardiac arrests occurred in children, teenagers, or young adults. Seventy-five percent of the patients survived the immediate arrest, and 67 percent appeared to have survived to hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The survival rates in our study are significantly higher than the most optimistic survival rates in the medical literature, and the portrayal of CPR on television may lead the viewing public to have an unrealistic impression of CPR and its chances for success. Physicians discussing the use of CPR with patients and families should be aware of the images of CPR depicted on television and the misperceptions these images may foster.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015
Bossaert, L. L., Perkins, G. D., Askitopoulou, H., Raffay, V. I., Greif, R., Haywood, K. L., Mentzelopoulos, S. D., Nolan, J. P., Van de Voorde, P., Xanthos, T. T., et al. (2015) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.033 · Cited by 625
El-Jawahri, A., Mitchell, S. L., Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Temel, J. S., Jackson, V. A., Rutledge, R. R., Parikh, M., Davis, A. D., Gillick, M. R., Barry, M. J., et al. (2015) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3200-2 · Cited by 95
Mathiesen, W. T., Bjørshol, C. A., Braut, G. S., & Søreide, E. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010671 · Cited by 95
Epstein, A. S., Volandes, A. E., Chen, L. Y., Gary, K. A., Li, Y., Agre, P., Levin, T. T., Reidy, D. L., Meng, R. D., Segal, N. H., et al. (2013) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2012.0524 · Cited by 91
Wilson, M. E., Krupa, A., Hinds, R. F., Litell, J. M., Swetz, K. M., Akhoundi, A., Kashyap, R., Gajic, O., & Kashani, K. (2015) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000000749 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Diem, S. J., Lantos, J. D., & Tulsky, J. A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1996-06-13
- Volume
- 334
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1578-1582
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2329271317
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Television — Miracles and Misinformation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199606133342406
- The paper
- Diem, S. J., Lantos, J. D., & Tulsky, J. A. (1996). Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Television — Miracles and Misinformation. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199606133342406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.