The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prophylaxis against Disseminated Mycobacterium avium Complex with Weekly Azithromycin, Daily Rifabutin, or Both
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Azithromycin is active in treating Mycobacterium avium complex disease, but it has not been evaluated as primary prophylaxis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Because the drug is concentrated in macrophages and has a long half-life in tissue, there is a rationale for once-weekly dosing. METHODS: We compared three prophylactic regimens in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial involving 693 HIV-infected patients with fewer than 100 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter. The patients were assigned to receive rifabutin (300 mg daily), azithromycin (1200 mg weekly), or both drugs. They were monitored monthly with blood cultures for M. avium complex. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, the incidence of disseminated M. avium complex infection at one year was 15.3 percent with rifabutin, 7.6 percent with azithromycin, and 2.8 percent with both drugs. The risk of the infection in the azithromycin group was half that in the rifabutin group (hazard ratio, 0.53; P = 0.008). The risk was even lower when two-drug prophylaxis was compared with rifabutin alone (hazard ratio, 0.28; P<0.001) or azithromycin alone (hazard ratio, 0.53; P = 0.03). Among the patients in whom azithromycin prophylaxis was not successful, 11 percent of M. avium complex isolates were resistant to azithromycin. Dose-limiting toxic effects were more common with the two-drug combination than with azithromycin alone (hazard ratio, 1.67; P=0.03). Survival was similar in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: For protection against disseminated M. avium complex infection, once-weekly azithromycin is more effective than daily rifabutin and infrequently selects for resistant isolates. Rifabutin plus azithromycin is even more effective but is not as well tolerated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility
Hiramatsu, K. (1997) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/40.1.135 · Cited by 1,984
Prophylaxis with Weekly Versus Daily Fluconazole for Fungal Infections in Patients with AIDS
Havlir, D. V., Dubé, M. P., McCutchan, J. A., Forthal, D. N., Kemper, C. A., Dunne, M. W., Parenti, D. M., Kumar, P. N., White, A. C., Witt, M. D., et al. (1998) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/515018 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Havlir, D. V., Dubé, M. P., Sattler, F. R., Forthal, D. N., Kemper, C. A., Dunne, M. W., Parenti, D. M., Lavelle, J. P., White, A. C., Witt, M. D., Bozzette, S. A., & McCutchan, J. A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1996-08-08
- Volume
- 335
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 392-398
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2336284588
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.