Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,950

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Comparison of Multimodal Therapy and Surgery for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Open access
Walsh, Thomas N., Noonan, Noirin, Hollywood, Donal, Kelly, Alan, Keeling, Napoleon, Hennessy, Thomas P.J.·1996·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled studies suggest that a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy improves the survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial comparing surgery alone with combined chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. METHODS: Patients assigned to multimodal therapy received two courses of chemotherapy in weeks 1 and 6 (fluorouracil, 15 mg per kilogram of body weight daily for five days, and cisplatin, 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area on day 7) and a course of radiotherapy (40 Gy, administered in 15 fractions over a three-week period, beginning concurrently with the first course of chemotherapy), followed by surgery. The patients assigned to surgery had no preoperative therapy. RESULTS: Of the 58 patients assigned to multimodal therapy and the 55 assigned to surgery, 10 and 1, respectively, were withdrawn for protocol violations. At the time of surgery, 23 of 55 patients (42 percent) treated with preoperative multimodal therapy who could be evaluated had positive nodes or metastases, as compared with 45 of the 55 patients (82 percent) who underwent surgery alone (P<0.001). Thirteen of the 52 patients (25 percent) who underwent surgery after multimodal therapy had complete responses as determined pathologically. The median survival of patients assigned to multimodal therapy was 16 months, as compared with 11 months for those assigned to surgery alone (P=0.01). At one, two, and three years, 52, 37, and 32 percent, respectively, of patients assigned to multimodal therapy were alive, as compared with 44, 26, and 6 percent of those assigned to surgery, with the survival advantage favoring multimodal therapy reaching significance at three years (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal treatment is superior to surgery alone for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199608153350702

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,950

Metadata

Authors
Walsh, T. N., Noonan, N., Hollywood, D., Kelly, A., Keeling, N., & Hennessy, T. P. J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1996-08-15
Volume
335
Issue
7
Pages
462-467
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2333224485
Cited by
1,950
References
0
FWCI
63.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Multimodal Therapy and Surgery for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199608153350702
The paper
Walsh, T. N., Noonan, N., Hollywood, D., Kelly, A., Keeling, N., & Hennessy, T. P. J. (1996). A Comparison of Multimodal Therapy and Surgery for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199608153350702

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.