Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Compared with Surgery Alone for Localized Esophageal Cancer
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We performed a multi-institutional randomized trial comparing preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone for patients with local and operable esophageal cancer. METHODS: Preoperative chemotherapy for patients randomly assigned to the chemotherapy group included three cycles of cisplatin and fluorouracil. Surgery was performed two to four weeks after the completion of the third cycle; patients also received two additional cycles of chemotherapy after the operation. Patients randomly assigned to the immediate-surgery group underwent the same surgical procedure. The main end point was overall survival. RESULTS: Of the 440 eligible patients with adequate data , 213 were assigned to receive preoperative chemotherapy and 227 to undergo immediate surgery. After a median possible study time of 55.4 months, there were no significant differences between the two groups in median survival: 14.9 months for the patients who received preoperative chemotherapy and 16.1 months for those who underwent immediate surgery (P=0.53). At one year, the survival rate was 59 percent for those who received chemotherapy and 60 percent for those who had surgery alone; at two years, survival was 35 percent and 37 percent, respectively. The toxic effects of chemotherapy were tolerable, and the addition of chemotherapy did not appear to increase the morbidity or mortality associated with surgery. There were no differences in survival between patients with squamous-cell carcinoma and those with adenocarcinoma. Weight loss was a significant predictor of poor outcome (P=0.03). With the addition of chemotherapy, there was no change in the rate of recurrence at locoregional or distant sites. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemotherapy with a combination of cisplatin and fluorouracil did not improve overall survival among patients with epidermoid cancer or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to improve the prognosis of responders.
“NACT has been shown to improve the prognosis of responders.”
From Prediction of the response to chemotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer by gene expression profiling of biopsy samples (2010) · cites this paper as [3]
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793 · see citing works
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ohigashi, Y., Sho, M., Yamada, Y., Tsurui, Y., Hamada, K., Ikeda, N., Mizuno, T., Yoriki, R., Kashizuka, H., Yane, K., et al. (2005) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-1469 · Cited by 796 · see citing works
Survival after surgery for oesophageal cancer: A population-based study
Rouvelas, I., Zeng, W., Lindblad, M., Viklund, P., Ye, W., & Lagergren, J. (2005) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70347-8 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Dimairo, M., Pallmann, P., Wason, J., Todd, S., Jaki, T., Julious, S. A., Mander, A. P., Weir, C. J., Koenig, F., Walton, M. K., et al. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04334-x · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Shimada, Y., Watanabe, G., Yamasaki, S., Maeda, M., Kawabe, A., Kaganoi, J.-I., Itami, A., Fukumoto, M., Kanda, Y., & Imamura, M. (2000) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00049-6 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Takemasa (2010) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo_00000763 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kelsen, D. P., Ginsberg, R., Pajak, T. F., Sheahan, D. G., Gunderson, L., Mortimer, J., Estes, N., Haller, D. G., Ajani, J., Kocha, W., Minsky, B. D., & Roth, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- RTOG Foundation (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Western University (CA)
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1998-12-31
- Volume
- 339
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 1979-1984
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2338880854
- Cited by
- 1,343
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 69
- FWCI
- 35.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (U10CA037422, CA 32115, CA37422, U10CA032115, CA-21661, U10CA021661)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal and GI Pathology
- Keywords
- esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, esophagectomy, overall survival, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, weight loss, locoregional recurrence, surgical morbidity
- MeSH terms
- Adenocarcinoma, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Cisplatin, Esophageal Neoplasms, Female, Fluorouracil, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Survival Analysis, Treatment Failure, Neoadjuvant Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review