The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Cigarette Smoking on Lung Function in Adolescent Boys and Girls
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the sex-specific effects of cigarette smoking on the level and growth of lung function in adolescence, when 71 percent of people in the United States who smoke tried their first cigarette. METHODS: We studied the effects of cigarette smoking on the level and rate of growth of pulmonary function in a cohort of 5158 boys and 4902 girls 10 to 18 years of age, examined annually between 1974 and 1989 in six cities in the United States. RESULTS: We found a dose-response relation between smoking and lower levels of both the ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity (FEB1/FVC) and the forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75 percent of FVC (FEF25-75). Each pack per day of smoking was associated with a 3.2 percent reduction in FEF25-75 for girls (P=0.01) and a 3.5 percent reduction in FEF25-75 for boys (P=0.007). Whereas the FVC level was elevated in smokers, the rate of growth of FVC and FEV1 was reduced. Among adolescents of the same sex, smoking five or more cigarettes a day, as compared with never smoking, was associated with 1.09 percent slower growth of FEV1 per year in girls (95 percent confidence interval 0.70 to 1.47) and 0.20 percent slower growth in boys (95 percent confidence interval, -0.16 to 0.56), and with 1.25 percent slower growth of FEF25-75 per year in girls (95 percent confidence interval 0.38 to 2.13) and 0.93 percent slower growth in boys (95 percent confidence interval, 0.21 to 1.65). Whereas girls who did not smoke reached a plateau of lung function at 17 to 18 years of age, girls of the same age who smoked had a decline of FEV1 and FEF25-75. CONCLUSION: Cigarette smoking is associated with evidence of mild airway obstruction and slowed growth of lung function in adolescents. Adolescent girls may be more vulnerable than boys to the effects of smoking on the growth of lung function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gender differences in airway behaviour over the human life span
Becklake, M. R., & Kauffmann, F. (1999) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.54.12.1119 · Cited by 698
Prescott, E., Bjerg, A., Andersen, P., Lange, P., & Vestbo, J. (1997) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.97.10040822 · Cited by 441
Sex differences and sex steroids in lung health and disease
Townsend, E. A., Miller, V. M., & Prakash, Y. S. (2012) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2010-0031 · Cited by 395
de Marco, R., Accordini, S., Cerveri, I., Corsico, A., Antó, J. M., Künzli, N., Janson, C., Sunyer, J., Jarvis, D., Chinn, S., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200603-381oc · Cited by 306
Decline of FEV1 by age and smoking status: facts, figures, and fallacies
Kerstjens, H. A., Rijcken, B., Schouten, J. P., & Postma, D. S. (1997) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.52.9.820 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Gold, D. R., Wang, X., Wypij, D., Speizer, F. E., Ware, J. H., & Dockery, D. W.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1996-09-26
- Volume
- 335
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 931-937
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2315858942
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Cigarette Smoking on Lung Function in Adolescent Boys and Girls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199609263351304
- The paper
- Gold, D. R., Wang, X., Wypij, D., Speizer, F. E., Ware, J. H., & Dockery, D. W. (1996). Effects of Cigarette Smoking on Lung Function in Adolescent Boys and Girls. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199609263351304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.