The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficacy of Pamidronate in Reducing Skeletal Complications in Patients with Breast Cancer and Lytic Bone Metastases
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates such as pamidronate disodium inhibit osteoclast-induced bone resorption associated with cancer that has metastasized to bone. METHODS: Women with stage IV breast cancer who were receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy and had at least one lytic bone lesion were given either placebo or pamidronate (90 mg) as a two-hour intravenous infusion monthly for 12 cycles. Skeletal complications, including pathologic fractures, the need for radiation to bone or bone surgery, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia (a serum calcium concentration above 12 mg per deciliter [3.0 mmol per liter] or elevated to any degree and requiring treatment), were assessed monthly. Bone pain, use of analgesic drugs, performance status, and quality of life were assessed throughout the trial. RESULTS: The efficacy of treatment was evaluated in 380 of 382 randomized patients, 185 receiving pamidronate and 195 receiving placebo. The median time to the occurrence of the first skeletal complication was greater in the pamidronate group than in the placebo group (13.1 vs. 7.0 months, P=0.005), and the proportion of patients in whom any skeletal complication occurred was lower (43 percent vs. 56 percent, P = 0.008). There was significantly less increase in bone pain (P=0.046) and deterioration of performance status (P=0.027) in the pamidronate group than in the placebo group. Pamidronate was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly infusions of pamidronate as a supplement to chemotherapy can protect against skeletal complications in women with stage IV breast cancer who have osteolytic bone metastases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Roodman, G. D. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra030831 · Cited by 2,755
Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies
Coleman, R. E. (2001) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1053/ctrv.2000.0210 · Cited by 1,920
Marx, R. E., Sawatari, Y., Fortin, M., & Broumand, V. (2005) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.07.010 · Cited by 1,648
Bisphosphonates: Mechanism of action and role in clinical practice
Drake, M. T., Clarke, B. L., & Khosla, S. (2008) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/83.9.1032 · Cited by 1,644
Bisphosphonates: Mechanisms of Action
Fleisch, H. (1998) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.19.1.0325 · Cited by 1,019
Metadata
- Authors
- Hortobagyi, G. N., Theriault, R. L., Porter, L., Blayney, D., Lipton, A., Sinoff, C., Wheeler, H., Simeone, J. F., Seaman, J., Knight, R. D., Heffernan, M., Reitsma, D. J., Kennedy, I., Allan, S. G., & Mellars, K.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1996-12-12
- Volume
- 335
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1785-1792
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2316096113
- Cited by
- 1,026
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of Pamidronate in Reducing Skeletal Complications in Patients with Breast Cancer and Lytic Bone Metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199612123352401
- The paper
- Hortobagyi, G. N., Theriault, R. L., Porter, L., Blayney, D., Lipton, A., Sinoff, C., Wheeler, H., Simeone, J. F., Seaman, J., Knight, R. D., Heffernan, M., Reitsma, D. J., Kennedy, I., Allan, S. G., & Mellars, K. (1996). Efficacy of Pamidronate in Reducing Skeletal Complications in Patients with Breast Cancer and Lytic Bone Metastases. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199612123352401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.