The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of Ostial Renal-Artery Stenoses with Vascular Endoprostheses after Unsuccessful Balloon Angioplasty
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty is a safe and effective treatment for nonostial stenoses of the renal arteries, but it has proved to be disappointing for ostial stenoses. Therefore, we prospectively studied the use of intravascular stents for the treatment of critical ostial stenoses after unsuccessful balloon angioplasty. METHODS: Stainless-steel endoprostheses were placed across 74 renal-artery stenoses located within 5 mm of the aortic lumen in 68 patients with hypertension. Twenty patients had mild or severe renal dysfunction. The indications for stent placement were elastic recoil (63 arteries) or dissection (1 artery) of the vessel after angioplasty, or restenosis after initially successful balloon angioplasty (10 arteries). Patients were followed for a mean of 27 months with measurements of blood pressure and serum creatinine, duplex sonography, and intraarterial angiography. RESULTS: Initial technical success was achieved in all patients. Minor complications (local hematomas) occurred in only three patients; there were no major complications. Eighty-four percent of the patients were free of primary occlusion 60 months after the procedure. Restenosis of more than 50 percent of the vessel diameter occurred in 8 of 74 arteries (11 percent). Reintervention resulted in a secondary patency rate of 92 percent. Long-term normalization of blood pressure was achieved in 11 patients (16 percent). Serum creatinine levels did not change significantly after successful stent implantation in patients with previously impaired renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate placement of renal-artery stents is technically feasible without major complications. The favorable early and long-term results suggest that primary stent placement is an effective treatment for renal-artery stenosis involving the ostium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hirsch, A. T., Haskal, Z. J., Hertzer, N. R., Bakal, C. W., Creager, M. A., Halperin, J. L., Hiratzka, L. F., Murphy, W. R. C., Olin, J. W., Puschett, J. B., et al. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.174526 · Cited by 3,708
Stenting and Medical Therapy for Atherosclerotic Renal-Artery Stenosis
Cooper, C. J., Murphy, T. P., Cutlip, D. E., Jamerson, K., Henrich, W., Reid, D. M., Cohen, D. J., Matsumoto, A. H., Steffes, M., Jaff, M. R., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1310753 · Cited by 1,021
Flash pulmonary oedema and bilateral renal artery stenosis: the Pickering Syndrome
Messerli, F. H., Bangalore, S., Makani, H., Rimoldi, S. F., Allemann, Y., White, C. J., Textor, S., & Sleight, P. (2011) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr056 · Cited by 183
Raman, G., Adam, G. P., Halladay, C. W., Langberg, V. N., Azodo, I. A., & Balk, E. M. (2016) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m16-1053 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Blum, U., Krumme, B., Flügel, P., Gabelmann, A., Lehnert, T., Buitrago-Tellez, C., Schollmeyer, P., & Langer, M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1997-02-13
- Volume
- 336
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 459-465
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2339016240
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Ostial Renal-Artery Stenoses with Vascular Endoprostheses after Unsuccessful Balloon Angioplasty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199702133360702
- The paper
- Blum, U., Krumme, B., Flügel, P., Gabelmann, A., Lehnert, T., Buitrago-Tellez, C., Schollmeyer, P., & Langer, M. (1997). Treatment of Ostial Renal-Artery Stenoses with Vascular Endoprostheses after Unsuccessful Balloon Angioplasty. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199702133360702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.