Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 440

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fungal Sinusitis

deShazo, Richard D., Chapin, Kimberle, Swain, Ronnie E.·1997·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Until recently, there has been no consensus on the classification of or the diagnostic criteria for fungal sinusitis. Many case reports and series have lacked the histopathological data necessary to distinguish invasive from noninvasive disease, used similar terms to describe different syndromes, or included patients with noninvasive disease in studies of invasive fungal sinusitis. Thus, the literature has provided only limited guidance with respect to the care of patients with these conditions. A number of recent investigations have addressed these problems and led to both a histopathologically based classification and criteria for diagnosis.15 Since the newer surgical techniques and . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199707243370407

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 440

Metadata

Authors
deShazo, R. D., Chapin, K., & Swain, R. E.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1997-07-24
Volume
337
Issue
4
Pages
254-259
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4253083258
Cited by
440
References
0
FWCI
13.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fungal Sinusitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199707243370407
The paper
deShazo, R. D., Chapin, K., & Swain, R. E. (1997). Fungal Sinusitis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199707243370407

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.