Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficacy of the Rhesus Rotavirus–Based Quadrivalent Vaccine in Infants and Young Children in Venezuela

Open access
Pérez-Schael, Irene, Guntiñas, María J., Pérez, Mireya, Pagone, Vito, Rojas, Ana M., González, Rosabel, Cunto, Walter, Hoshino, Yasutaka, Kapikian, Albert Z.·1997·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rotaviruses are the principal known etiologic agents of severe diarrhea among infants and young children worldwide. Although a rhesus rotavirus-based quadrivalent vaccine is highly effective in preventing severe diarrhea in developed countries, in developing countries its efficacy has been less impressive. We thus conducted a catchment study in Venezuela to assess the efficacy of the vaccine against dehydrating diarrhea. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 2207 infants received three oral doses of the quadrivalent rotavirus vaccine (4x10(5) plaque-forming units per dose) or placebo at about two, three, and four months of age. During approximately 19 to 20 months of passive surveillance, episodes of gastroenteritis were evaluated at the hospital. RESULTS: The vaccine was safe, although 15 percent of the vaccinated infants had febrile episodes (rectal temperature, > or =38.1 degrees C) during the six days after the first dose, as compared with 7 percent of the controls (P<0.001). However, the vaccine gave 88 percent protection against severe diarrhea caused by rotavirus and 75 percent protection against dehydration, and produced a 70 percent reduction in hospital admissions. Overall, the efficacy of the vaccine against a first episode of rotavirus diarrhea was 48 percent. Horizontal transmission of vaccine virus was demonstrated in 15 percent of the vaccine recipients and 13 percent of the placebo recipients with rotavirus-positive diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: In this study in a developing country, the quadrivalent rhesus rotavirus-based vaccine induced a high level of protection against severe diarrheal illness caused by rotavirus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199710233371701

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Pérez-Schael, I., Guntiñas, M. J., Pérez, M., Pagone, V., Rojas, A. M., González, R., Cunto, W., Hoshino, Y., & Kapikian, A. Z.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1997-10-23
Volume
337
Issue
17
Pages
1181-1187
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2028814069
Cited by
338
References
0
FWCI
33.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of the Rhesus Rotavirus–Based Quadrivalent Vaccine in Infants and Young Children in Venezuela. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199710233371701
The paper
Pérez-Schael, I., Guntiñas, M. J., Pérez, M., Pagone, V., Rojas, A. M., González, R., Cunto, W., Hoshino, Y., & Kapikian, A. Z. (1997). Efficacy of the Rhesus Rotavirus–Based Quadrivalent Vaccine in Infants and Young Children in Venezuela. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199710233371701

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.