The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Omeprazole Compared with Misoprostol for Ulcers Associated with Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is effective for ulcers associated with the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) but is often poorly tolerated because of diarrhea and abdominal pain. We compared the efficacy of omeprazole and misoprostol in healing and preventing ulcers associated with NSAIDs. METHODS: In a double-blind study, we randomly assigned 935 patients who required continuous NSAID therapy and who had ulcers or more than 10 erosions in the stomach or duodenum (or both) to receive 20 mg or 40 mg of omeprazole orally in the morning or 200 microg of misoprostol orally four times daily. Patients were treated for four weeks or, in the absence of healing, eight weeks. Treatment success was defined as the absence of ulcers and the presence of fewer than five erosions at each site and not more than mild dyspepsia. We then randomly reassigned 732 patients in whom treatment was successful to maintenance therapy with 20 mg of omeprazole daily, 200 microg of misoprostol twice daily, or placebo for six months. RESULTS: At eight weeks, treatment was successful in 76 percent of the patients given 20 mg of omeprazole (233 of 308), 75 percent of those given 40 mg of omeprazole (237 of 315), and 71 percent of those given misoprostol (212 of 298). The rates of gastric-ulcer healing were significantly higher with 20 mg of omeprazole (but not 40 mg of omeprazole) than with misoprostol. Healing rates among patients with duodenal ulcers were higher with either dose of omeprazole than with misoprostol, whereas healing rates among patients with erosions alone were higher with misoprostol. More patients remained in remission during maintenance treatment with omeprazole (61 percent) than with misoprostol (48 percent, P=0.001) and with either drug than with placebo (27 percent, P<0.001). There were more adverse events during the healing phase in the misoprostol group than in the groups given 20 mg and 40 mg of omeprazole (59 percent, 48 percent, and 46 percent, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The overall rates of successful treatment of ulcers, erosions, and symptoms associated with NSAIDs were similar for the two doses of omeprazole and misoprostol. Maintenance therapy with omeprazole was associated with a lower rate of relapse than misoprostol. Omeprazole was better tolerated than misoprostol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Patrono, C., Coller, B., Dalen, J. E., Fitz Gerald, G. A., Fuster, V., Gent, M., Hirsh, J., & Roth, G. (2001) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.119.1_suppl.39s · Cited by 963
An Evidence-Based Update on Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
Ong, C. K. S., Lirk, P., Tan, C. H., & Seymour, R. A. (2007) · Clinical Medicine & Research · doi:10.3121/cmr.2007.698 · Cited by 587
Weitz, J. I., Eikelboom, J. W., & Samama, M. M. (2012) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.11-2294 · Cited by 527
van Leerdam, M. E., Vreeburg, E. M., Rauws, E. A. J., Geraedts, A. A. M., Tijssen, J. G. P., Reitsma, J. B., & Tytgat, G. N. J. (2003) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07517.x · Cited by 508
Present status and strategy of NSAIDs-induced small bowel injury
Higuchi, K., Umegaki, E., Watanabe, T., Yoda, Y., Morita, E., Murano, M., Tokioka, S., & Arakawa, T. (2009) · Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1007/s00535-009-0102-2 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawkey, C. J., Karrasch, J. A., Szczepañski, L., Walker, D. G., Barkun, A., Swannell, A. J., & Yeomans, N. D.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1998-03-12
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 727-734
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2333044470
- Cited by
- 863
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 66.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Omeprazole Compared with Misoprostol for Ulcers Associated with Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199803123381105
- The paper
- Hawkey, C. J., Karrasch, J. A., Szczepañski, L., Walker, D. G., Barkun, A., Swannell, A. J., & Yeomans, N. D. (1998). Omeprazole Compared with Misoprostol for Ulcers Associated with Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199803123381105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.